Criteria for assessing the exam in literature. Criteria for evaluating exam tasks in social science from fipi Criteria for assessing exams

24.04.2020

Starting from the new academic year 2017-2018, changes have been made to the system for passing the Unified State Exam in our country in several subjects. Rumors about the upcoming changes have been circulating for a long time. On the eve of the Minister of Education and Science Russian Federation Olga Vasilyeva confirmed this information. According to her, the changes will affect a number of subjects, including Unified State Examination in Literature 2018. School graduates will take the exam differently next year.

Innovations developed by FIPI ( Federal Institute pedagogical measurements), will radically change the very model of conducting final tests for schoolchildren. It is planned that now the exam will consist only of creative tasks. Model tests will be abolished.

Whether this will improve the quality of the check, time will tell. Teachers, the eleventh-graders themselves and their parents have already begun to thoroughly prepare for the exams in literature today. What changes in the passing of the exam in literature await graduates?

FIPI presented their official list:

The requirement to justify the choice of an example for comparison was cancelled.
A fourth was added to the three previous themes of the essay.
The criteria for assessing the performance of tasks with a detailed answer have undergone strong changes.
Immediately by 15 points (from 42 to 57 points) the maximum for the entire work increased.

Testing with one short answer, on which schoolchildren, especially three-year-olds, so often left, was canceled. Thus, there will be no chance to earn points on tests. According to the developers, such innovations are fully justified. Indeed, because of its simplicity and monosyllabism, the answer could be guessed.

With the help of tests of this type (there are 12 such questions in the current exam), knowledge of terminology in literary criticism was tested. In addition, experts believe that such testing is unnecessary. Since in a detailed written response, it is already necessary to operate with terms. And this is enough to test basic knowledge. Now, in order to successfully pass the unified state exam in literature, the guys will have to work hard.

Starting from 2018, assignments in literature will be aimed at testing graduates to present their thoughts beautifully and competently, to be able to reason based on the works they have read. Many tasks are related to development oral speech in schoolchildren and their vocabulary

Increase in the number of optional tasks

Graduates will still be able to choose assignments for composition from the proposed options. If before there were only three tasks, now the list has increased to four. Thus, the choice has expanded, and the student can stop at an interesting question to answer the work.

Recall that earlier literature of three periods was proposed for the topic of the essay:

from ancient Russian to literature of the first half of XIX century;
second half of the 19th century;
Russian literature of the XX century.

In 2018, the developers added works late XIX- the beginning of the 21st century. Now the "latest" literature of our state is also included. This also includes works that have been born in the last ten years. The addition of the fourth topic of the essay is the most important innovation in the literature exam

The fact that the topics for essays were works of the post-Soviet period does not mean at all that graduates should read any specific authors (there are no mandatory names on the list). This innovation will allow the examiner on the material literary works the end of the XX beginning of the XXI centuries to reveal for this topic of your choice.

The volume of writing will grow

As for the minimum length of a detailed essay, it has become larger. This year it was enough to use 200 words in your answer. Next year, the number will increase by 50 to 250 words.

The requirements for mini-essays have changed. They have become clearer and more specific. If earlier it was necessary to write a text 5-10 sentences long. And, as you know, sentences are also short, from three words, for example.

They are also complex, using a large number of revolutions and introductory words. Now everything has become very clear. The length of the mini-story should be at least 50 words. This applies to any tasks related to both text analysis and comparative and contrast tasks.

Simplifying Matching Jobs

Next year, it was proposed to simplify tasks for comparison as much as possible. To show their reading outlook, graduates had to compare the text using two works. Now, one will be enough to justify your choice.

Evaluation criteria are specified

Experts have been thinking for a long time about the question of how to assess students' knowledge in in full and as objectively as possible. After all, now there are no tasks with short answers that made the knowledge test automatic.

From 2018 for graduates criteria USE assessment proposed to be tightened. It is clarified that in addition to testing, which takes into account knowledge of terminology, the task should include five essays on selected topics

According to the developers, now single exam will be as close as possible to the traditional version of the school exam. Perhaps in time one State exam and will be cancelled.

Specialists involved in the development of a new model of the Unified State Examination in Literature continue to work on a system for assessing knowledge in this subject. They hold meetings problematic issues, express opinions, try to find optimal solutions.

The new exam in literature has already been launched

A trial (experimental) exam in literature with some changes that are currently officially approved was held for the first time in academic year(2015-2016) in 13 subjects of the Russian Federation. More than 1000 students from 60 educational institutions took part in it.

It is worth noting that 94% of teachers of literature are the results of an experiment on the introduction of a new model conducting the exam satisfied on this subject. In their opinion, today this option for conducting the exam allows you to fully give an objective assessment of the knowledge of students.

But graduates need not worry. The updated exam is practically no different from the tests of previous years. Yes, and it is unlikely that the state exam in literature will become more difficult. It will not cause any difficulties for graduates.

Already, on the Internet, developers have published a demo version of the Unified State Examination in Literature 2018 with answers and criteria. Future graduates, parents, teachers and all interested persons can familiarize themselves with the demo version and understand the structure of control and measuring materials, the number of tasks, their form and level of complexity. This gives a general idea of the requirements that will apply to the answers to the exam in literature.

Video news

Every year, about 40,000 graduates choose the Unified State Examination in Literature. This is due to the fact that this subject is required for admission to such specialties as: philologist, linguist, teacher humanities. About 90% of applicants who have chosen this certification successfully cope. However, not everyone achieves high results.

Someone does not know the content of the classics well enough, others do not finish the theory. But main reason failure lies in not knowing the format of the exam and not understanding what the experts expect to see.

Check out what's new and the most important performance requirements to avoid making a fatal mistake and not losing the cherished numbers.

Main:
– There are 17 tasks in KIM, of which basic level difficulty - 12 (short answer), increased - 5 (detailed explanation).
– Threshold – 8 primary points(32 secondary or test).
- Usage additional materials not provided, that is, you cannot take anything with you except a black helium pen and a passport.
– The work is designed for 235 minutes.

Exam Structure

The test consists of 2 sections.

Part I is composed of two segments. The first includes epic, lyrical epic, dramatic works - Nos. 1-9. The second is the assessment of the lyrical composition - No. 10-16. Moreover, No. 8, 9, 15, 16 are required to be answered in 5-10 sentences on form 2;

Part II is presented in the format of a full essay of at least 200 words. The theme must be chosen from 4 proposed.

Evaluation criteria

As already mentioned, the minimum you need to score is 8, and the maximum is 57 for the entire test. Let's take a closer look at the scoring system below:

for the correct No. 1-7 and No. 10-14 they give each - 1;
numbers eight and five count as -5;
questions 9 and 16 are scored at -10;
the last item is the most expensive - 15.

Here it is necessary to take into account that it is possible to get the maximum only if your answer meets the criteria, attracts literary arguments, is logical and complies with speech norms. Otherwise, your work will only be partially appreciated.

Subject

The main difficulty is that you have to deal with a large amount of material. The code for this item mentions:

9 poems;
150 poems;
6 plays;
11 novels;
20 stories;
4 stories.

Their student must thoroughly study and be able to use them in many ways. After all, these books will not be with you in the audience.

Essay 17

By right, writing can be called the most global task of all the above. Here, an eleventh-grader will need not only an understanding of the semantic context, but also literacy.

To begin with, it is proposed to make a choice in favor of one direction from the classification of artistic creations by time interval:

Old Russian or XVIII - the first half of the XIX century;
second half of the nineteenth century;
the end of the XIX-XX centuries;
XIX - beginning of the XXI century.

To score the highest score, write with several aspects in mind:

The problem is revealed deeply, the author's position is not distorted.
Absent in the involved literary-theoretical concepts.
This excerpt is drawn justifiably at the level of analysis.
The presentation is consistent and logical.
The rules of the Russian language are observed.

If you have written less than 150 words, then your work will not be considered completed and will not be evaluated.

Passing the state test is not only based on the fact that you read a lot, because this does not mean that you fully understand the thoughts of the author. To read well means to memorize and analyze what is read, to be able to formulate one's opinion, to draw parallels between book and historical events and build a causal relationship of the storyline.

All the information collected is up-to-date, and, therefore, it will be useful to you on the exam. Take advantage of it to increase your chances of being enrolled in.

The unified state exam has long become a familiar annual practice for us, and for schoolchildren it has become a part of life. Starting from the 10th grade, future graduates are intensively preparing for certification, focusing on the subjects they have chosen. In order to successfully pass the exam, in addition to thorough preparation, you need to know all the requirements and follow the changes and innovations in the upcoming exam. So, what's new in the USE-2018?

This year, exam materials will be printed in the schools themselves on the day of the exam. Forms and control materials are now one-sided and black and white. Fill them, respectively, is necessary only on one side.

As for the objects themselves, here too the changes did not pass by. So, for example, in the Russian language exam, one task was added for knowledge of lexical norms and the ability to see speech errors. The number of tasks has increased to 26, and the maximum primary score for completing the entire work has increased from 57 to 58.

Introduced the fourth theme of the essay on latest literature. The maximum initial score for work increased immediately by 15 points - from 45 to 57, which indicates changes in the evaluation criteria. For tasks with a detailed answer (No. 9 and 16) you can get up to 10 points, and No. 8 and 15 - 5 points. Speech errors will be strictly judged.

Social studies also fell into the group of subjects that were not bypassed by innovations. Here, the changes affected the assessment criteria for tasks 28 and 29. When preparing, the emphasis should be on tasks with a logical relationship of concepts, since it was in the essay (task 29) that one point was added for logic. The maximum primary score increased from 62 to 64 points.

For those who have chosen physics as their profile exam, it is worth emphasizing the basic concepts of the elements of astrophysics. A new task No. 24 has been added to the test part of KIMs, concerning this particular section of physics. The maximum primary score for the entire work increased to 52.

The total number of tasks in chemistry has also increased due to the addition of one new increased complexity in the second part. In tasks No. 30 and 31, the acquired material will be checked on the topics "Redox Reactions" and "Ion Exchange Reactions". However, the maximum primary score is still 60, since the criteria for evaluating the basic part of the Unified State Exam in chemistry have changed.

Finally, we will tell you about the innovations in the upcoming exam in computer science. Now in tasks 8, 11, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25 code examples are written not in C, but in C ++.

In all other subjects, there were no significant changes and innovations. Recall that two subjects remain mandatory for graduates - Russian and mathematics (basic for a certificate, profile for entering a university). No fluff!

Each graduate who wants to become a student of one of the universities of the Russian Federation in 2018 faces a difficult task - to successfully pass the exam, as well as choose the right educational institution and faculty for submission of documents. The majority of 11th graders and their parents are faced with the final exam grading system for the first time and often find it difficult to find answers to the questions that arise. Therefore, we decided to shed light on important points.

In 2017-2018 the main rules passing the exam will not change significantly. This means that the 100-point system for grading final tests will still be relevant for graduates.

How is everything going?

During the verification examination papers for each correctly completed task, the graduate is credited with the so-called " primary scores”, which, upon completion of the work check, are summed up and converted into a “test score”, which is indicated in the USE certificate.

Important! Since 2009, the scale for converting primary and test USE scores into traditional five-point grades for schools has not been officially used, because in 2017 and 2018 final exams are not included in the certificate.

Checking work is done in two ways:

automatically (with the help of special programs and technical means);
manually (the correctness of detailed answers is checked by two independent experts).

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of an automatic check. If the basic rules were not followed when filling out the answer table, the computer may not protect the result, and only the graduate himself, who did not follow a number of mandatory rules, will be to blame for this.

If controversial issues arise during the expert review, a third specialist is involved, whose opinion will be decisive.

When to expect results?

The following time limits apply by law:

data processing (for compulsory subjects) at the RCSC should not last longer than 6 calendar days;
for data processing (subjects of choice) RTsOI give 4 days;
verification at the Federal Testing Center should take no more than 5 working days;
approval of the results by the State Examination Commission - 1 more day;
up to 3 days to send the results to the USE participants.

In practice, from the moment you pass the exam to getting your hands on official result may take 8 to 14 days.

Converting USE scores to grade

Despite the fact that officially in 2018 the scale for transferring points according to USE subjects in a five-point assessment is not used, many still want to interpret their result in a more familiar "school" system. To do this, you can use special tables or online calculators.

Table for converting OGE test scores into grades



Russian language
Mathematics


Informatics
Social science
Foreign languages

Biology
Geography
Literature

The second method is a little easier and more convenient than searching for the desired values in the cells of a huge table. It is enough just to choose a subject (mathematics, Russian, chemistry, physics, history, English language, social studies ... and other subjects), enter data and get the desired result in a matter of seconds.

We suggest trying how simple and convenient it is to use in practice the online calculators of the USE score and its conversion to a 5-point grade.

Transfer of points from primary to test

Converting USE scores to grades

Internet systems for applicants

The academic year 2017-2018 is over, the exam has been passed, the results are known, and even the interactive scale for transferring primary scores showed that USE result located in a fairly good range ... But, is this enough to enter the desired university?

Assess the real chances of entry, based on test scores and the minimum passing threshold set by the university.

Important! The minimum passing score is formed by the university itself. It will directly depend on the scores of applicants who apply in 2018. The more popular the specialty, the higher the passing score will be.

Often, at the TOP faculties, even 100-point results are not enough for admission to the budget. Only winners of the Olympiads, who give significant additional points, have a chance to see their last name in the lists of applicants for such areas.

In 2018, the most popular services for selecting a university and monitoring the entrance score threshold for various specialties will be:

Ucheba.ru
Apply online
Calculator high school economy
Postyplenie.ru
Typical entrant

Finding these services is very easy. It is enough to enter their name into any search engine.

(with extended answer)

Correct answers to three questions - 2 points.
Correct answers to any two questions - 1 point
Any one question is answered correctly. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social science is assessed:

Correctly explained and answered two questions - 2 points.
Any two elements of the answer are correctly given - 1 point
Any one element of the answer is correct. OR OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social science is assessed:

Two sources (paths) are correctly named and 2 examples are given (total 4 examples) - 3 points.
Two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 2-3 examples are given - 2 points.
One or two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 1 example is given. OR 1 source (path) is correctly named and 2 examples corresponding to it are given - 1 point
All responses that do not meet the above criteria for scoring 1, 2, and 3 points. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

Three functions are correctly named and explained - 3 points.
Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are explained - 2 points.
One or three functions are correctly named, one of them is explained. OR Only three functions are correctly named - 1 point
Only one or two functions are correctly named. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

25.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the concept - 2 points

Explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept is given completely, clearly, clearly, unambiguously: essential features related to the characteristic this concept/ distinguishing it from other concepts (the content of the concept is correctly disclosed through the generic affiliation of the concept and its specific difference(s)) - 2 points.
The meaning of the concept as a whole is disclosed, but in an incomplete volume: only one of the essential features relating to the characteristics of this concept / distinguishing it from other concepts is indicated, OR there are some inaccuracies / shortcomings in the answer that do not distort it in essence - 1 point
In the answer, along with the correct ones, incorrect signs (characteristics, descriptions, comparisons, etc.) are given that distort the content of the concept in essence. OR There are no specific characteristics, essential features of the concept / only non-essential features are indicated that do not reveal the meaning of the concept. OR Other situations not provided for by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points - 0 points.

Grading guidelines:

Not counted: - a characteristic of a generic affiliation, repeating the concept, the meaning of which must be revealed; - as an essential characteristic, a sign already contained in the formulation of the task; - explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept through negation or only through the etymology of the word, metaphor or allegory.
If according to criterion 25.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the concept), 0 points are given, then according to criterion 25.2, 0 points are given.

25.2 Availability and quality of proposals containing information about various aspects of the concept - 2 points

Two sentences have been drawn up, each of which contains information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about the aspects of the concept that meet the requirement of the task - 2 points.
One sentence has been drawn up containing information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about any aspect of the concept in accordance with the requirement of the task - 1 point
- 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

The assessment does not count:

sentences containing essential errors that distort the meaning of the concept and / or its individual aspects;
proposals that reveal relevant aspects at the household level, without involving social science knowledge;
phrases, uncommon sentences.

Maximum score - 4

in social science is assessed:

Three functions are correctly named and illustrated with examples - 3 points.
Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are illustrated with examples - 2 points.
One to three functions are correctly named, one of them is illustrated by example(s) - 1 point
Only one or three functions are correctly named. OR Any number of examples are given without specifying functions. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

The sphere, type of stratification and three criteria are correctly indicated - 3 points.
The sphere, type of stratification and one or two criteria are correctly indicated. OR The sphere and three criteria are correctly indicated - 2 points.
The scope and type of stratification are correctly indicated. OR The sphere and one or two criteria are correctly indicated - 1 point
Only the sphere is correct. OR The scope is not specified (incorrectly specified), regardless of the presence of other elements of the answer. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

28.1 Disclosure of the topic on the merits - 3 points

A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. Both of these "obligatory" points are detailed in sub-points, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 3 points.
A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. Only one of these "obligatory" points is detailed in sub-points, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 2 points.
A complex plan contains at least three points, including only one point, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. This "mandatory" clause is detailed in sub-clauses, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 1 point
All other situations not covered by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points. OR Cases when the graduate's answer in form does not meet the requirements of the task (for example, it is not drawn up in the form of a plan with points and sub-points highlighted) - 0 points.

Grading guidelines:

Paragraphs/subparagraphs that are abstract and formal in nature and do not reflect the specifics of the topic are not counted in the assessment.
If criterion 28.1 scores 0, then criterion 28.2 scores 0

28.2 Correctness of wording of paragraphs and subparagraphs of the plan - 1 point

The wording of the points and sub-points of the plan is correct and does not contain errors, inaccuracies - 1
All other situations 0

Maximum score - 4

in social science is assessed:

29.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the statement - 1 point.

The meaning of the statement is revealed: one or more main ideas related to the content of the social science course are correctly identified and / or one or more theses are formulated in the context of the statement, which (s) requires (s) substantiation - 1 point
The meaning of the statement is not disclosed: not a single main idea is singled out / not a single thesis is formulated. OR The highlighted idea, the formulated thesis do not reflect the meaning of the statement / the meaning of the statement was replaced by general reasoning (“homemade”) that does not reflect the specifics of the proposed statement. OR The disclosure of the meaning is replaced by a direct retelling / paraphrasing of the given statement / a consistent explanation of each word in the statement without explaining the meaning of the statement as a whole - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

If according to criterion 29.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the statement), 0 points are given, then 0 points are given for all other evaluation criteria.

29.2 Theoretical content of the mini-essay - 2 points.

(explanation of the key concept(s), availability and correctness of theoretical provisions)

In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) and theoretical provisions are given that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) - 2 points.
In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors), theoretical provisions are not presented. OR In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, theoretical provisions that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) are given, the meaning of the key concept(s) is not disclosed. OR In the given explanations of the key concept(s) / theoretical provisions, there are certain inaccuracies that do not distort the scientific meaning of these concepts, theoretical provisions - 1 point
All other situations not provided for by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points, including if there is no theoretical content of the mini-essay: the meaning of the key concept(s) is not explained, the theoretical provisions are not given or are not related to the main idea / the thesis, do not reveal the meaning of the statement. OR Reasonings of an everyday nature are given without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

If criterion 29.2 scores 0, then criterion 29.3 scores 0.

29.3 Theoretical content of the mini-essay: the presence and correctness of reasoning, conclusions - 1 point.

In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, based on the correct explanation(s) of the key concept(s), the theoretical provisions are given consistent and consistent reasoning related to each other, on the basis of which a reasonable and reliable from the point of view of scientific social science conclusion - 1 point
All other situations, including reasoning and conclusions of an everyday nature without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

29.4 The quality of the facts and examples given - 2 points.

At least two correct, detailed formulated facts / examples are given from various sources, confirming the illustrated idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion and not duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay - 2 points.
Only one correct, detailed formulated fact/example is given, confirming the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection between this fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay. OR Correct, detailed facts/examples are given from sources of the same type, confirming the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay. OR Two examples are given from sources of different types, duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay - 1 point
All other situations not covered by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points
0 - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

Facts can be used as sources public life(including according to media reports), personal social experience (including books read, movies watched), materials subjects(history, geography, etc.).

Examples from different subjects are considered as examples from different sources.
Facts/examples containing factual and semantic errors that led to a significant distortion of the essence of the statement or indicate a misunderstanding of the historical, literary, geographical and (or) other material used are not counted in the assessment.

Maximum score - 6