Original taken from tsar_ivan The symbol of the victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War.

Holiday is coming Great Victory Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War. New paid revelations are starting to appear. It is curious that they do not come up with anything new, but dig up old decayed rotten “news” from the graves, not even disdaining that many of them were invented back in the Goebbels propaganda ministry, like the rest - by dirty imperialist anti-Soviet propaganda from America ... At the same time, everything these vysers of theirs were buried at that time.

Let's think about the problem with the symbol of the Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War...
At present, we are being imposed from above " St. George ribbon” as a symbol of Victory, while hushing up about the victorious people - the Soviet .., about who won, who, with their blood, achieved Victory with their lives. The victorious Soviet people did not use the "St. George's Ribbon" as a symbol of their Victory. To make sure - just look at the photos and video of the celebration of Victory Day. The symbol of victory on all veterans of the Great Patriotic War, on Soviet people - these are red bows - a particle of the Red Banner of the country and the Banner of Victory. This is a definite fact!

The symbol of Victory is the Red Banner and particles of this banner! Replacing real symbols of Victory with fictitious, religious ones is a crime against our ancestors who liberated their country and defeated fascism. This is a crime against our history. Religious symbols under the names of fictitious characters - depersonalize our real Heroes, who for the most part had nothing to do with religion then - being Komsomol members, communists, atheists ...
That's all reality!

1945 Victory Parade on Red Square in Moscow

May 9, 1975 Victory Parade on November 7

Victory Parade. Moscow. May 9, 1985

Additionally:

I signed the Reichstag: "You were defeated by a Russian girl from Saratov" -

Today, even on November 7, you rarely see a person with a revolutionary red bow. Meanwhile, bows have a glorious history and their own symbolism. There were times when men were showered with bows from head to toe. Now other times, but - there are exits to the theater, receiving guests, friendly parties. A bow, the smallest, will give an elegant look to a casual dress.

Today, even on November 7, you rarely see a person with a revolutionary red bow. Meanwhile, bows have a glorious history and their own symbolism. There were times when men were showered with bows from head to toe. Now times are different, but ... there are exits to the theater, receiving guests, friendly parties. A bow, the smallest, will give an elegant look to a casual dress. Yes, and it's easy to make. From lace, leather, braid, cord, from fabric - silk, satin, velvet, organza, cambric, polyester, muslin, felt, chiffon ...

Red, revolutionary

The Soviet history was long, the country was large, and at different times "on the ground" the bows were treated differently.

In general, bows were welcomed in schools, kindergartens, and at demonstrators. Unregulated bows in everyday life could symbolize not romance, elegance, creative flight, but frivolity. Or, worse, an ideological activist could see in the bantu the worship of bourgeois ideals, although the Soviet fashion magazines did not put up hard obstacles to the bantu. Old artists, musical old women and secretaries could afford bows without looking back at the Komsomol organizer. Individuals wearing a bow could also protest against everyday life.

For the iron ladies

Meanwhile, even for men, not so long ago, a bow was as natural as a tie today. For a long time, boys up to three years old, and sometimes up to five or six, wore dresses with lace and frills, which could complement long curls tied with bows. Men in ancient history wore bows in braids, ties in the form of bows, ribbon rosettes. In Shakespeare's time, men's shoes could be decorated with ribbon bows studded with diamonds.

And today it is difficult to imagine a business woman in bows: she prefers a business style. Of course, the power look, the imperious style, in principle, served the business lady in good stead. A prime example of this is Margaret Thatcher. Silhouette, hairstyle, fixed with varnish, fabrics, thoughtful colors, accessories, a strict bag with short handles - everything worked for the image of a confident woman in the corridors of power. But even the "iron lady" allowed herself bows, and not only plain ones, which did not violate the impeccability of the costume and only emphasized elegance.

love knot

A bow is usually considered a loop knot, with ears, a stretch loop knot, looped or gathered ribbon, or other material. It can also be an interweaving of loops, knots, especially in jewelry. In jewelry, bows and knots have often been associated with love and marriage for centuries. As early as the 3rd century BC. e. The knot motif was used by Greek jewelers as a symbol of marriage. The symbol of the love knot was also among the ancient Celts.

And there is a bow in history that has occupied the minds of readers for almost seven centuries. He is mentioned in the 14th century English poet Geoffrey Chaucer. In The Canterbury Tales, he writes: “Our monk was a dashing fighter, a hunter. / (...) His cloak was lined with the best squirrel. / Richly embroidered and well-tailored. / He clasp, as befits a dandy, / Decorated with a gold “love bow” . "Love bow" is interpreted as a clasp in the form of a complex bow or rosette. But what is it? For modern man this clasp is as mysterious as the monk who fastened the hood with an unusual gold pin with a mysterious love knot.

Love knots were intertwined loops - a symbol of fidelity and devotion, and this bow can be interpreted as fidelity and love for a woman. Or it can be more difficult to interpret it as religious devotion. It can also be an echo of the ideas of love common during this period, or a generous gift. The reader has many versions, up to the fact that a strand of a beloved or beloved is stored in the pendant. Or this clasp is a family attribute or a symbol of belonging to a religious brotherhood, an order. In general, they agree that a monk should not wear such a clasp, like furs - this is a violation of the rules of clothing for a monk. Although, perhaps, in describing the monk, Chaucer is not referring readers to negative qualities of his character, but to ordinary human weakness.

The discussion of this clasp in England does not subside to this day, but it would seem - just a bow. One way or another, but in the XIV century, as we see, the love knot was a remarkable symbol.

From Louis to Edward

The bow could have been a symbol of love during the time of Louis XIV (1638 - 1715). At the end of the 17th century, jewelers designed brooches and necklaces in the form of bows of gold and silver studded with precious stones for the royal court. This precious bow, depending on how it was worn, could have different meanings. In the hairstyle, he could mean that the lady was looking for a man, attached to her heart - love was found, on a ribbon around the neck, he could tease the gentleman.

Under Louis XIV, everything that was possible was decorated with bows - gloves, shoulders, sleeves, wigs, shoes, scarves on the belt were tied with a bow. Men carefully emphasized the slenderness of their legs, which was facilitated by high-heeled shoes, richly decorated with ribbons, bows, rosettes.

The era of Louis XIV entered the Gallant Age. It lasted over 100 years, from 1661 to 1789. It was an amazing age. Impeccable manners, speech, looks, intonations, shades and halftones, in favor of interest in the sciences and arts, refinement. Extreme courtesy reigns, endless respect for a woman, a desire to fulfill ladies' whims. The costumes are unusually beautiful, men's attire is often more luxurious than women's. Beauty given by nature is not considered a great achievement, because beauty can be created. To help this - an arsenal of wigs, corsets, false calves for men, balls for the cheeks for the roundness of the lady's face, layers of decorative cosmetics, blush. All this mercifully concealed imperfections and age. The Lady of the Gallant Age is fragile, young, graceful, feminine, erotic, cutesy, she has a wasp waist and a round face.

Sometimes the eighteenth century is called the century of women, and Rococo fashion is feminine. During this period, the male appearance underwent feminization, men are feminine. A pumped-up body is not held in high esteem, sophistication is valued. Men in foamy lace, tight jackets, tight culottes, high heels; wigs with curls, a pigtail and a bow are in fashion. For men's hairstyles, special silk bags, velvet cases are created, which could be decorated with a bow.

Under Louis XV (1710 - 1774), a series of bows on the corsage came into fashion. The style was introduced by the favorite of Louis, Madame de Pompadour, patroness of sciences and arts. We see bows of various shades in various portraits of the Marquise de Pompadour, they enliven the outfit and, together with puffy skirts, emphasize the waist. Bows were selected in color along with or in contrast.

In the days of the French Revolution, new trends came into fashion, and the Empire was already in the yard with its antique notes and simplicity of lines. In the Victorian era, long and varied, with its puffy skirts, sleeves, ribbons, pleats, frills, multi-colored bows happily fall on clothes. WITH late XIX centuries and jewelery art, inspired by examples of the past, again turns to bows.

At the beginning of the twentieth century, which is already so close to us in time, in the era of King Edward VII (thanks to the children's suit of which the marine style came into fashion), ladies wear a corset and an S-shaped dress (due to the inconvenience of clothing, they sometimes fainted), love Irish lace. Their bows come in a variety of colors and sizes, often quite large. They can also be seen on members of the women's hockey team, some of these bows resemble a tie that ladies liked back in the middle of the 19th century.

What is not annoying in a man?

Soon the first World War, followed by the second. They changed not only fashion - the whole world. The clothes of women of a number of professions became conservative, and bows were replaced by variations of ties. Women in the 1980s, employed in law and banking, donned business suits, buttoned up their blouses and mastered bow ties. They could be a little larger than the standard men's, but, as a rule, the fabric, color, models were the same.

Despite modern rhythms and the desirable practicality of the costume, women still love bows. And they wear them on handbags, shoes, like bracelets, they tie scarves with a bow and half bow. In theaters and the Philharmonic, you can see a brooch-bow with a pearl, a tiny bow on a strap and a large one on a handbag, appreciate the creativity of older ladies in tying lace bows. Even a modern American woman, as one American fashion designer said, can order a dress with a huge, meter-long stiff bow, which is fastened from the back to the waist, like a giant butterfly.

As for the modern man, it is probably difficult for him to offer a bow, it is also difficult to imagine a man's shoe with a bow in diamonds emerging from a jeep. But for dandies, creative individuals for solemn occasions, for example, the idea of ​​​​a tie from the 17th century will be interesting - men wrapped their necks with a long scarf, which was tied in a knot or bow in front, and sometimes fixed with a ribbon tied into a bow resembling a bow tie.

Yes, it's unusual. Why not? In any case, according to British scientists, bows were not included in the list of items that irritate women in men (for example, men's tights).

Inga Zemzare, for Fontanka.ru

The headline of the message: More about the February "revolution".

The February “revolution” of 1917 – “Great? Bloodless? Russian?"

Defeat of the Main intelligence agency General Staff Russia - the beginning of a new large-scale operation of the servants of Satan to destroy Russia and exterminate the third God-chosen Russian People. Those. First of all, this is spiritual warfare!

The arrested general (Petrograd mayor) in the State Duma saw the winners - mostly Jewish youth. I wonder how these milk-suckers, who naturally have a high "proletarian" consciousness, but otherwise - complete zeros, managed to be at the head of the entire planet ?! They must have had a shaggy hand!

“All those who deviate from the Lord are in the hands of Satan, and he sows them and throws them wherever he wants”

The royal rage in February 1917 is the result of the export of spiritual infection to Russia

First they killed those who really were the support of the Tsar and political system, defenders of the people and knew a lot about criminals and knew how to neutralize them. And if you look at the disbandment of the Berd special forces brigade from this angle?

“Great? Bloodless? Russian?"

The winners - mostly Jewish youth - reveled in their great historical role lead the revolution

The red bow is a symbol of the coming, hitherto unheard of in history, bloodshed

On March 1, a red flag was raised over the Winter Palace, the main residence of the Emperor of All Russia. With the liquidation of the last military detachment loyal to the Sovereign Emperor in Petrograd [the military units that remained loyal to the government were pulled to the city center on Palace Square], according to one of the prominent conspirators, "there were no armed forces at the disposal of the government - neither in Petrograd, nor in Gatchina, neither in Peterhof nor in Tsarskoye. [By disbanding the combat-ready units, the servants of Satan achieve the same thing - to leave the Russian People without protection from the Jews, Chechens and other nonhumans! See, for example, here what the Jewish non-human intends to do with the Russian people.]

“The struggle for power,” the eyewitness summed up what he saw and experienced in those days, “went out onto the street and turned into an All-Russian pogrom, that is, into open violence against a person and property ...
Many openly expressed their delight by mutual kissing. A red bow - a symbol of the coming, hitherto unheard of in history, bloodshed - adorned most of the breasts. ... The contemplation of the total darkening of the mind was morally painful. ... Member of the Duma G.A. Vishnevsky told me, without comment, that Russia would now be a republic. He did not go into details, but when he saw the radiant figure of V.V. Shulgin, surrounded by a greedy crowd of listeners and having heard excerpts from his story about a trip to the Tsar and about the Tsar's abdication, I understood with all my heart, with all my being, that now that terrible, now irreparable, now unheard-of crime in history has finally "come true", which is called betrayal of one’s legitimate Monarch and one’s Motherland during the war, and that the main instigator and culprit in this crime is the Fourth State Duma - the Fourth Most Criminal State Duma ... "

[Certainly, in Russia the most important instigators and perpetrators were the "fourth most criminal State Duma". But the traitors and traitors from this Duma were the usual six cannibal Jews who did the most black and thankless work, and then they were treated like expendable material: they wiped their feet and threw them into the dustbin of history. Very many who knew a lot were simply killed by inventing petty guilt: for the edification of the next six Masons, so that they would learn the need for unquestioning obedience to their masters.]

On March 3, the Executive Committee of the Petrosoviet decided to arrest the Romanov Dynasty, suggesting that the Provisional Government carry out this arrest together with the Soviet. ...

This resolution reflected the correct assessment of the significance of individual "Highest Persons" - in the possible political game of monarchists - constitutional and autocratic ... The government accepted the proposal of the Executive Committee ... The decision of the Provisional Government took place on the evening of March 5, but the actual arrests were made only on March 8. .."

[Do you understand that every year people celebrate March 8th?!! These people are involved in the complicity of the ritual action called "The overthrow of the God-established government in Russia, in the kingdom of the God-chosen Russian People." No matter how those who celebrate them relate to these holidays, they unequivocally testify to God that they do not care about the history of their country, the tragedy that occurred these days back in 1917. And to admonish them, the Lord God allows them sorrows and illnesses. If there is an aggravation of old sores after the "holiday" of March 8, then this is a sure sign of God's love for unreasonable lovers of holidays on the blood of faithful Tsar's servants, and His urgent recommendation to come into the mind of Christ takes place.]

“At present,” said A.F. Kerensky, speaking on March 7 at a meeting of the council of officer and soldier’s deputies in the Moscow Ars cinema, “we are not in any danger from the old Dynasty. Each of Them is under unremitting surveillance.

Soon the Provisional Government will make a special announcement about the Dynasty. In any case, I assure you that the Dynasty apparatus has been disabled. The dynasty will be placed in such conditions that once and for all it will disappear from Russia. Create a new people and new army, and everything that was left behind, give it to me, the Minister of Justice, and the Provisional Government. " Having said this, Kerensky fell into a swoon, coming to his senses in a minute ...

[When this "hero" fainted, it became clear to the eyes of all those present how unbearable a burden both Kerensky and the cannibal Jews tried and are trying to put on their fragile shoulders. For a new, bastard people, instead of the great God-chosen Russian People, and a new, puppet army in Russia, instead of the Russian Army with the traditions of Emperor Peter the Great, Suvorov, Ushakov, they will never succeed in creating - the gut is thin.]

On the night of February 27 to February 28, the Provisional Committee of the State Duma decided to send government agencies his commissars, dismissing the tsarist ministers. The arrests of the Tsarist top officials went on all night.

Since the morning of February 28, testified G.G. Peretz, dignitaries "began to be delivered under heavy escort to the Tauride Palace.

An English officer greeted the arrested high military command of Petrograd in an extremely peculiar way.

The most curious details of his arrest, the situation and the main actors the coup was left in his memoirs, written in 1929 in Belgrade, by the Petrograd mayor, General A.P. Bulk*. Together with his closest employees, he was arrested on the afternoon of February 28 at the Admiralty.

* Alexander Pavlovich Balk (7.2.1866†20.10.1957) - came from an old noble family of the St. Petersburg province of Swedish origin. Graduated from the 1st Cadet Corps and Pavlovsk military school. Released to the 16th Ladoga Infantry Regiment. Lieutenant (1886). The sovereign personally granted him a gold watch for his diligence (October 1909). Promoted to major general (12/6/1912). By personal decree he was appointed the Petrograd mayor (November 1, 1916). The appointment was facilitated by his close acquaintance with the Minister of Internal Affairs A.D. Protopopov, with whom they studied together in the 1st Cadet Corps. Rasputin knew the general closely and considered him a good man. During civil war was part of the Volunteer Army and the Armed Forces of the South of Russia. At the end of 1919 he was evacuated from the Crimea to Thessaloniki. In exile in Yugoslavia, after 1945 in Brazil. Died in Sao Paulo.

“The noise of the crowd in the courtyard,” he recalled, “the clatter of many feet along the wide and sloping stairs and screams ... ... The crowd broke in and filled the whole room. We stood up. Three figures stood out from the crowd: an ensign in rifle uniform: drunk, gray, puffy face, covered in pimples, eyes swollen with fat. He held a large Mauser in his hands, which he alternately pointed at our faces. [So a combat officer, even when drunk, will never do!] He was dressed in uniform [Obviously, he got his uniform during the looting of a military warehouse!] The other is a very young soldier, white, with a beautiful delicate complexion, also well dressed, but not in uniform, in an unbuttoned overcoat with red shoulder straps and piping. He was drunk. He held a naked officer's saber with an Annenkov lanyard in his hands, waved it terribly over our heads and at times pretended that he wanted to stab us. He shouted more than anyone else and reveled in the role of the leader of the insurgent people. [It is very likely that both of these "heroes " etc osto disguised civilians! The impudence of the "ensign" and this "soldier", shown in relation to the generals, indicates their Jewish origin. But even a Jew, a man who despises everyone except himself, had to take a strong drink for courage in order to appear to arrest the highest military command of the city.] Between these two stood all the time melancholy, completely meek with gray hair. It was girded over a long coat with a saber on a new wide belt. [The new belt also points to the looted army warehouse!]

The drunken soldier and the ensign, with their eyes wide open, looked menacingly at me and before they had time to open their mouths, I said loudly, so that the whole crowd could hear, “Here I am the mayor. Arrest me and take me to the Duma,” and went forward from the room. . They gave me the way, shouts of joy were heard, and the whole crowd rushed after me. ...I quickly descended the stairs. All my colleagues, not lagging behind, kept together. General Khabalov quietly joined us in the corridor. …

We turned left and here we were stopped. There were two huge platform trucks. "Get in." ... The driver gave a move. The truck jerked and immediately ran into a cast-iron pedestal, twisted it, but itself deteriorated, and, despite all the efforts of the enraged driver, did not move.

At this time, a car jumped out of Gorokhovaya Street past the City Administration and opened fire from a machine gun. Panic seized the crowd around us. Everyone rushed to the ground and began firing indiscriminately in all directions. ...I felt a stream of warm air on the right. "Lord, if only they finished it off soon," Colonel Levison* said with a deep sigh and pressed himself tightly against me. Moans and curses were heard.

* Lieutenant Colonel Werner Vernevovich Levison - Staff Officer for Special Assignments under the Petrograd Mayor. "He shot himself two weeks later at his mother's grave at the Smolensk cemetery. The work and devotion to duty of this officer were exceptional" (The death of Tsarskoye Petrograd. The February Revolution through the eyes of the mayor A.P. Balk // Russian Past. St. Petersburg. 1991. No. 1. C . 50). - S. Fomin).

The shooting continued for two minutes. Finally, the shooting car sped past. The crowd now calmed down. ...

I shouted: "Well, if there is no car, take us to the Duma - on foot." I quickly went, wanting to avoid Nevsky, to Palace Square. Several armed men surrounded us, and we came to the turn to the Palace Bridge. Here, fortunately for us, we stumbled upon a car with a private audience. Our guards, who were not particularly pleased with the prospect of walking a long way, quickly disembarked the passengers and shouted to us: "Get in quickly!" ... The car was surrounded by soldiers and private individuals. ...Everyone was shooting upwards, shouting "Hurrah" and waving their weapons over our heads. ... We drove to the Palace Embankment, almost deserted, and went at a fast pace past the grandiose-strict line of palaces. Watchmen and janitors, silently and sympathetically, as it seemed to me, looked at us. I went to the embankment almost every day, and they knew me by sight.

At the Winter Palace two English officers were walking towards us. One I knew well by sight, I forgot his last name, but his figure, unusually long and lean, was known to everyone who had been to the Astoria. So this officer greeted us in a peculiar way. He stopped, turned to face us, thrust his hands into his pockets, and, bending back into his long torso, burst into loud laughter, and then shouted something and pointed his finger at us.

[Let's note that the raging crowd with a huge percentage of young men "with hooked noses and curly hair" has an unsatisfied "thirst for blood." And at the sight of the officers and generals of the Russian army (there is a war with an external enemy!) This crowd immediately has a desire to thank their defenders with "atrocious reprisals." But the “psychosis” of the crowd for some reason does not extend to the British officers, the “allies” are calmly walking around the Winter Palace while Russian officers and generals are being transported under escort. The junior officer of the "allies" reacts extremely inappropriately to the arrested acquaintances of the generals (the mayor and the commander of the Petrograd garrison). And he does not behave like an officer of a civilized, and even a union state. Try to answer the question yourself: why do these “strange things” take place? At the same time, it makes no sense to consider the level of upbringing of this English officer.

[And we dare to assume that these two British officers went out to stretch their bones after hard operational work on a further plan of measures for the development of the "revolutionary" process in Petrograd. And at this time they are transporting past them the obvious fruit of their successful activities - the arrested top generals Petrograd. Well, how can you not rejoice at your such successful and fruitful work! - news reporter.]

Godless historians with a Marxist-Leninist outlook will obviously answer that the crowd knew that the officers of the “allies” responded with great joy to the call: “Proletarians of all countries – unite!” But the attitude of the Russian officers to this call, the escorts did not even consider it necessary to ask!]

At the entrance to the State Duma and behind bars stood a dense mass of people. ... The car ... stopped at the main entrance to the Duma, and without delay we quickly went inside, I don’t remember exactly where. The room is large, lined with tables, and behind them are the winners, mostly Jewish youth. [The "historians" of the Marxist-Leninist spirit will obviously tell us that it was the Jewish youth who no longer wanted their hard lot, but the top ( High Command warring and victorious Russia) could no longer command and win! And the behavior of the "allies" (English officers) confirms exactly this!]

General Kazakov and I were separated from our companions.
My request not to separate us was not respected and was taken along a long, bright corridor to the so-called Ministerial Pavilion, and they were taken to the second floor, where, as it turned out later, they suffered a fate incomparably better than ours. Our convoy, 8 people, consisted partly of soldiers with rifles, and partly of Jewish youths making a revolution. Just released from prisons, they, together with the soldiers, beat off the pace along the narrow corridors with special enthusiasm. Girdled with cartridge belts, holding revolvers of the most terrifying systems high in outstretched hands, they reveled in their great historical role in leading the revolution.

"Balk's behavior after the revolution is also typical. For a long time, the Provisional Government kept him under arrest, then decided to release him, but he said that he would not leave prison until he made sure that all the officials who were his subordinates were treated strictly within the law" . (Vasiliev A.T. Protection. Russian secret police. S. 462). - S. Fomin.

So we marched to glory."

(You read and catch yourself thinking: somewhere it already happened ... Yes, this is the Israeli regiment, formed in 1786 by G.A. Potemkin! Petersburg Palace, later occupied by the State Duma.

“Potemkin,” wrote the historian N.A. Engelhardt at one time, “came up with a one-of-a-kind idea - to form a regiment of Jews, which he would call the Israel Cavalry ...

For the time being, one squadron of the future regiment was presented to His Serene Highness. In lapserdaks, with beards and sidelocks as long as their stirrups were short, crouched in fear in the saddle, the Jews presented a striking picture.
Painful anxiety was read in their olive-like eyes, and the long Cossack lances, which they held in their skinny hands, wavered and swayed senselessly, nodding their yellow badges in different directions. However, the battalion commander, a most serious German who had used a lot of labor to teach a few sons of Israel the art of riding and military evolutions, commanded, and everything went according to the rules in order.

The battalion was especially good when it rode into the attack. Comic figures, with developing sidelocks and lapserdaks, losing stirrups and pantofles and galloping with spears at the ready... ...It seems that only His Serene Highness was striving for this. He stopped evolution by thanking the battalion commander.

[Sergei Fomin in his article posted several photographs that illustrate whose February Revolution it was. Under one of them is the following text. The Jews are celebrating a "great bloodless revolution". February 1917. On the banner there are slogans in Hebrew: “Long live the democratic republic!”, “Long live the national autonomy of the peoples of Russia!”, “Long live popular socialism!”, “Long live the Jewish socialist party!”

Well, how can one not recall the "prophetic" words of the by no means complacent American Jew Schiff, the financier of two "Russian" revolutions and terrorist actions of "Russian" militants in Russia, said by him to Witte back in 1905: “Tell your Sovereign that if the Jewish people do not gets rights ** voluntarily, then those will be torn out with the help of the revolution. (P. Multatuli. Yekaterinburg atrocity. S. 408-409.)

* BUND - the general Jewish social democratic union. It originated in the western provinces of Russia in 1897. But the demonstration is in Petrograd!

How the Jews celebrated the "great bloodless revolution":

February 1917. On the banner there are slogans in Hebrew: “Long live the democratic republic!”, “Long live the national autonomy of the peoples of Russia!”, “Long live popular socialism!”, “Long live the Jewish socialist party!”

[Here it is impossible to resist the "noble" "indignation" about the black ingratitude of Alexander Shubin to Schiff, who worked hard to spread any spiritual contagion in Russia, including the Marxist-Leninist ideas of socialism and communism. This person (Shubin) accuses everyone who pays tribute to the merits of Yakov Schiff and his comrades in the destruction of the powerful Russian Empire as myth-makers.

The heirs of Schiff's work to establish the power of the servants of Satan over the whole world continue to finance everything that prevents the Russian People from coming to the mind of Christ, that is, the historical research of Alexander Shubin.
And he, like a partisan under interrogation, is silent about Schiff's merits before Satan!
He writes some nonsense (as the “great” Lenin taught about the signs of a revolution), that, they say, in February 1917, “the lower classes did not want to live like that anymore” (how? Pay the lowest taxes in the world? without a Jewish Talmudist, otherwise and without a Jew-Kabbalist on his back?), but “the tops could no longer” (or maybe they didn’t want to? It’s just not clear that the tops couldn’t or didn’t want to? Great Russia and the God-chosen Russian People?
But in this case, they turned out to be allies (albeit temporary to their horror!) of the winners - young men "with hooked noses and curly hair").]

To be continued.
.

1.03.1917 (14.03). - The Petrograd Soviet issued "Order No. 1", depriving officers of disciplinary power over soldiers. The beginning of the collapse of the Russian army

Democratic Order No. 1

In the February Revolution, the collapse of the monarchy was achieved by two forces: the bourgeois-liberal Committee of the State Duma, which created the Provisional Government as a result, and the Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies ("Sovdep"), at that time consisting of Mensheviks and other socialists (not Bolsheviks). Both structures advocated democracy, were led by Freemasons, and therefore at first they did not particularly compete (soon the socialists were introduced into the government). All of them were united by the goal of overthrowing the monarchy, and they all perceived the Russian army, especially the officers, as the only counter-revolutionary force capable of turning the revolution back. In fact, this could happen if there were a sufficient number of officers such as General F.A. in the army. Keller and Colonel A.P. Kutepov.

And therefore, precisely with the conscious goal of disintegrating the army, in order to protect itself, the Soviet of Deputies on March 1, 1917 issues its famous order No. 1 on the democratization of the army. This order transferred power in the army to soldiers' committees, established civil rights for soldiers and sailors, placed the political actions of the troops under the control of the Soviets, and abolished the titles of officers. The order undermined the influence of the counter-revolutionary officers, contributed to the transition of troops to the side of the revolution, playing on the selfishness and self-will of the armed crowd, into which the Russian army was turning. Officers were expelled from military units, in some places even killed.

True, the Provisional Government, which came to power on March 2, intended to continue the war against Germany in alliance with the "fraternal" Entente. Therefore, it tried to limit the effect of order No. 1 only to the Petrograd garrison, the naval minister of the Provisional Government Guchkov even canceled the order. Then, on March 7, the leadership of the Petrograd Soviet sent out an explanation that Order No. 1 concerned only the troops of the Petrograd Military District, not extending to front-line units.

However, the genie was already out of the bottle: the order continued to play a revolutionary role in the troops everywhere, and this is in short term led to the complete collapse of the army to the joy of Germany, exhausted by the war: she received a respite for eastern front. So the Februaryists sacrificed the national interests of the Russian people in the most difficult Great War for the sake of their revolutionary goals.

With the same goal - to paralyze the resistance of the defenders of the monarchy - the Provisional Government dissolved the police and opened prisons, releasing from them not only political prisoners of like-minded people, but also a lot of criminals: at first it seemed to the Februaryists that this was also in favor of the revolution. Only later did they admit in their memoirs (Kerensky, Milyukov, Tyrkova-Williams, and others) that they were "mistaken" in destroying conservative state structures, sowing chaos and underestimating the forces of evil that they could not cope with. But was it just a mistake?

It was in this first act of the Russian democratic government, Order No. 1, that it clearly demonstrated the essence of Western democracy: its stability is based on the moral decay of the people - in order to break the resistance of its healthy forces and more easily manipulate the selfishly unspiritual mass. In this, democracy is completely opposite to the Orthodox monarchy, which is based on the moral education of the people for the joint service of all social strata to the highest absolute values.

The Bolsheviks, after Lenin's arrival in Russia, who strengthened their party and seized power with the help of German money, managed then to curb this democratic chaos only by bloody terror and the proclamation of new "absolute values", although they were contrary to Orthodoxy, false, but with an even greater demand for sacrificial service to them. ...

The headline of the message: ATTEMPT ON THE RUSSIAN Tsardom

From the book of Oleg Platonov

ATTEMPT ON THE RUSSIAN Tsardom

The driving forces of the second anti-Russian revolution were world Freemasonry, the Russian liberal-Masonic underground, as well as socialist and nationalist (primarily Jewish) circles, which were active during the war on the money of the German and Austrian special services, as well as international anti-Russian centers.
In 1915-1916. in the Masonic lodges, reports were prepared on the topic "On the role of Freemasonry in the revolutionary struggle." Secretary of the Supreme Council of Russian Freemasons A.Ya. Halpern considered this secret organization as a center for coordinating the actions of various political parties in the struggle to overthrow the tsarist government.
World Freemasonry was primarily concerned about the beginning strengthening of Russia as a result of its decisive role in the victory over the German bloc. By that time, Russia had a huge military and economic potential, far exceeding the capabilities of the allies. The victorious end of the war, which was obviously expected by the summer of 1917, meant that Russia was acquiring a special role both in Europe and in the world in general. According to the results of the war, the historical Russian lands that had previously belonged to Austria-Hungary were to go to her, she established her control over the Balkans and Romania. Germany was losing Polish lands, which were united with the Kingdom of Poland into a single independent state under the scepter of the Russian Tsar, and, finally, Constantinople and the straits became Russian - a strategic point of influence in the Middle East and the Mediterranean. Such a strengthening of Russia did not suit her allies. A strong, just Russia became a brake on England's colonial policy in Asia and, above all, in the Middle East. France, on the other hand, referred the Balkans to its sphere of influence, and, in addition, it had its own interests in the Middle East and Asia.
In general, neither France nor England wanted to allow Russia to reorganize the world on a fair basis.
Noting the role of Russia's allies in the revolution, General Ludendorff wrote: "The tsar was overthrown by a revolution favored by the Entente. The reasons for the Entente's support of the revolution are not clear. Apparently, the Entente expected that the revolution would bring them some advantages."
Shortly before February 1917, one of the most important persons in world Freemasonry, the banker Lord Milner, Grand Overseer of the Grand Masonic Lodge of England, arrived in Petrograd. About the secret mission of this high-ranking Freemason, the Irish representative in the British Parliament declared: "Our leaders ... sent Lord Milner to Petrograd to prepare this revolution, which destroyed the Autocracy in the ally country."
The ambassadors of England and France in Petrograd D. Buchanan and M. Paleolog morally supported the leaders of the conspiracy against the Tsar. A.I. Guchkov later admitted that consent had been obtained from the representatives of the allies for the expulsion of the Tsar from Russia.
Milyukov, after an outrageous anti-state speech in the Duma, where he, in fact, called for the overthrow of the Tsar, was invited the English ambassador Buchanan for lunch, delivered by the ambassador's personal car to the embassy, ​​where a banquet was held in his honor.
The mayor of Moscow, Freemason Chelnokov, also famous for his anti-government speeches, received the highest state order of George-Michael. higher state awards England also received the dismissed Foreign Minister Sazonov. Known for his attacks against the Tsar and sharp anti-state speeches, the freemason-publicist A. Amfiteatrov was under the patronage of the Italian ambassador, who saved him from expulsion for anti-state activities.
In the spring of 1916, Milyukov visited England, where he established closer relations with the British. politicians and enlisted their support in the fight against the legitimate Russian government. On this trip, he is busy with uniting the representatives of the parliamentarians of the Entente countries into a single supranational organization, a kind of international parliament, which, with its authority, would support the struggle of the Russian liberal Masonic underground against the Russian government.
By 1917, Freemasonry was the most significant political force, the main detachment of which was 28 lodges of the Masonic Order "Grand Orient of France", uniting most influential statesmen of Russia.
Grand Dukes Nikolai Mikhailovich and Alexander Mikhailovich became Freemasons, Grand Dukes Nikolai Nikolaevich and Dmitry Pavlovich constantly collaborated with the Freemasons. The Freemason was General Mosolov, chief of the office of the Minister of the Tsar's Court.
At the head of world Freemasonry was the World Masonic Supreme Council of the Venerable and Wise Venusables. Representatives of Russia in this Council did not have the right to have their own delegation. The "interests" of the Russian Freemasons in this Council were represented by the French delegation.
Masonic international assemblies made decisions on the Masonic charter, binding for execution, Russian Freemasons, among whom were ministers, diplomats, military commanders, members of the State Duma, sought secret ways to put them into practice.
According to data obtained from official sources by the German Social Democrat E. Bernstein, who at one time held the post of Deputy Minister of Finance of Germany, the Bolsheviks received 60 million marks from Germany.
According to French intelligence, only through the American banker J. Schiff, Russian revolutionaries received at least 12 million dollars.

At first, the Bolsheviks were indifferent to the issues of symbolism: they used the red banner rather according to revolutionary tradition, and the coat of arms of Soviet Russia did not exist until July 1918.

However, with the beginning of Soviet state building, it became clear that the lack of official symbols creates many problems, especially in structures such as the army.

The initiative to adopt a new state flag came from the chief party bureaucrat, Yakov Sverdlov. The Bolsheviks considered him the best organizer, which is why Sverdlov headed the presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee.

On April 8, 1918, Sverdlov proposed to recognize the Red Banner of the Revolution as the state flag of Soviet Russia. The initiative was supported, and six days later, on April 14, a decree on the flag of the Russian Republic was published.

“Until April 1918, the white-blue-red flag, adopted by the Provisional Government, continued to be the official flag of the socialist republic. Although it was hardly used, there were cases when it was hung out on a par with the revolutionary red banners, ”said Stanislav Dumin, a historian, member of the Heraldic Council under the President of the Russian Federation, in an interview with RT.

• First Chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee Yakov Sverdlov
• RIA News

"Red" traditions

The communists, arguing the color of the new banner, referred to medieval Persia, where the Rebellion of the Red Banners took place at the end of the 8th century. However, it had nothing to do with the revolutionary movement, since it was purely religious in nature.

The red color as a revolutionary symbol became widespread in the era of the French Revolution, when the left-wing radicals (the Jacobins who came to power in the wake of the revolutionary terror of 1793-1794) actively used the red Phrygian cap as one of the emblems of the republic, and the red flag as a symbol of the blood of the martyrs revolution.

In the 19th century, the red flag finally established itself as a revolutionary symbol. And since the socialists and anarchists became the main revolutionaries at that time, it was they who arrogated to themselves the right to the red flag, which from now on was raised where uprisings against the authorities broke out.

In May 1831, in the Welsh town of Merthyr Tydville, workers rebelled against the British authorities. They supported the Chartist movement, opposing rising unemployment and wage cuts.

In 1832, the red flag is raised in Paris at the funeral of General Lamarck, a prominent liberal politician. The scarlet banner with the inscription "Liberty or Death" became the symbol of the Republicans in the revolution of 1832 that followed soon after. However, it was quickly suppressed by King Louis Philippe, and the reputation of the symbol of the rebels was established behind the red flag.

“The politicians made the red flag revolutionary. Previously, red was widely used in the coats of arms and banners of European states - from England to Switzerland. But since the 19th century, the red flag has become a symbol of the revolutionary movement, and it was in this capacity that the Bolsheviks accepted it, ”Dumin said in an interview with RT.

Revolution Symbol

During the revolution of 1848, the French communists tried to make the red banner the state flag of the republic, proclaimed on February 25. But the provisional government headed by Alphonse de Lamartine convinced the people of the need to preserve the tricolor banner, which became the symbol of the French nation. A compromise solution that met the requirements of the radicals was the red rosette - it was added to the flag as a sign of revolution. These events were immortalized by the artist Filippoto, who depicted in his painting Lamartine defending the tricolor flag on the steps of the Parisian municipality.

• "Alphonse de Lamartine at the Hôtel de Ville rejects the red flag on February 25, 1848"
• Felix-Emmanuel-Henri Philippoteaux

From March to May 1871, a revolutionary government operated in Paris. The capital of France, after mass dissatisfaction with the defeat in the war with Prussia, became the stronghold of the most radical forces: most of the deputies of the government created by the revolutionaries - the commune - were socialists and anarchists. And of course, they raised the red flag under which they fought against the troops of the French government, formed by the national assembly. But the commune was crushed, and the scarlet banner was outlawed again.

But the red flag was increasingly seen during labor strikes and rallies. So he "reached" and Russian Empire, appearing at the first political demonstration at the Kazan Cathedral in 1876. Soon the red color began to be used by the left and liberal Russian oppositionists. Representatives of the constitutional democrats marched under the red banner no less willingly than the socialists.

• The first demonstration on Znamenskaya Square in Petrograd in front of the monument to Alexander III
• Gettyimages.ru
• Hulton Archive

After the formation of the RSDLP (Russian Social Democratic Labor Party), the Social Democrats, both Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, also adopted the red flag. The red flag was raised during the days of the revolution of 1905, and after the February revolution of 1917 it became the main symbol of radical changes, while the state tricolor gradually faded into the background.

“Interestingly, the red flag was adopted as the state flag in , where the ruling Nazi party was considered socialist and therefore used the traditional color of the flag of the labor movement, adding to it the party emblem - the swastika. There is information that the inhabitants of German cities, surrendering to our army, plucked a circle with a swastika from the Nazi flags and hung red banners on their houses, ”Dumin said.

However, the Bolsheviks who came to power did not have a monopoly on the red flag. If the white movement chose the tricolor rejected by the communists as its banner, then the representatives of the left anti-Bolshevism remained faithful to the red color. In June 1918, a committee of members of the Constituent Assembly, dispersed by the Bolsheviks, gathered in Samara. The Social Revolutionaries, who seized leadership in it, opposed their recent Bolshevik allies under red banners.

The Izhevsk-Votkinsk workers' uprising against the Bolshevik dictatorship also took place under red flags. And the Izhevsk and Votkinsk divisions formed by the rebels went through the whole in the troops of Admiral Kolchak. They adopted the symbols of the white armies, but until the end of the war they went into battle to the sounds of the Internationale.

Banner of Victory

V Soviet time there was an opinion that red flags were widely used in Ancient Russia and Moscow State. However, modern historians consider this a delusion. Ancient banners were most often multicolored, richly embroidered with gold and silver thread. The red color has never been dominant, although it was widely used, because it is bright and visible from afar. In Russian chronicles there is no mention of the color of the banners of ancient Russian princes, but it is necessarily indicated that they were decorated with images of saints. Nevertheless, experts speak of a direct connection between the red flag and the Russian military tradition.

“The red color was also present on the ancient Russian banners, the banner of the militia of Minin and Pozharsky, and in the 18th-19th centuries it became one of the main colors of the regimental banners of the Russian imperial army,” Dumin noted.

The red flag was originally adopted as a state flag in the RSFSR, and then, after the formation of the USSR, it became a symbol of the young Soviet republic. The spread of left-wing ideology after the Second World War led to the power of the communists in many countries of the world - and a number of states “armed themselves” with the red banner.

“For Russia, the red banner is primarily the Banner of Victory, it is in this capacity that it is included in the modern symbols of our state. In addition, for most of our citizens, the red flag is associated with memories of the past. It often becomes a symbol of nostalgia for the successes and achievements of the USSR,” Dumin said.

• A soldier of the Red Army hoists the Banner of Victory on the building of the defeated Reichstag
• Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

According to the expert, in 1990, after the elections of deputies of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, the search for new symbols of Russia began.

“And the deputies turned to the white-blue-red flag, which at that time was already actively used at rallies and demonstrations as a symbol of democratic Russia. Initially, most of the deputies were not ready to support the symbol, which until recently was considered counter-revolutionary, but after the August events of 1991, the Petrovsky flag again became the state flag of Russia, ”summed up Dumin.

Symbols of the Revolution. November 6th, 2017

Hello dear.
Tomorrow we have a "red day of the calendar" :-) Whoever says anything - but 100 years is a date, so tomorrow I will be posting all day about the October Revolution (well, or the coup, if you prefer). So get ready :-))
Well, I'll start today.
Those who lived in the USSR remember that November 7 was one of the most important holidays in the country. Much more significant than May 1, or even Victory Day. Yes, it was like that :-))
But, surprisingly, there were not so many signs-symbols associated with this holiday.
Let's remember them.

So the first and foremost was cruiser Aurora". It's not entirely clear why this happened, to be honest. So they decided that the Aurora would be the symbol and that's it :-)) Although in the fall of 1918 they even planned to flood the cruiser in the fairway in the Kronstadt area so that potential interventionist ships would not break through to Petrograd. It worked out.

It began to be actively promoted as a symbol of the Revolution after 1927. Although the ship was still on the move and participated in campaigns, including foreign ones. Although the ship was outdated, and by 1941 the Aurora was planned to be excluded from the lists of the fleet, the war prevented this from being carried out.
The ship was in Oranienbaum and participated in the defense of the city. The 130-millimeter guns were removed from the ship and installed as a separate battery (artillery battery "A"), and the ship served as an air defense post. And I must say, de facto the Germans practically sank the ship.

In August 1944, a historic decision was made. The Executive Committee of the Leningrad City Council of Workers' Deputies adopted a resolution according to which the Aurora was to be installed at Petrogradskaya Embankment as a museum-monument of the history of the fleet and a training block of the Leningrad Nakhimovsky naval school. The ship was raised, cleaned and towed into place. There it stands to this day, except for 2 repairs in 1984 and in 2014. And to be honest, there is almost nothing left of the Aurora.

Another interesting point is that on February 22, 1968, by decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Red Banner cruiser Aurora was awarded the Order October revolution, becoming the only ship in the country twice decorated. Moreover, the cruiser itself is depicted on the order :-)))

Red clove.
Another symbol that was present everywhere and everywhere on this holiday. On postcards, in movies, at demonstrations and parades. Even in the buttonholes of the first persons of the state on that day one could see this particular flower.

I always thought why is that? And most likely, these are allusions to another symbol that was present in 1917 - a red bow. For revolutionary-minded individuals wore either red ribbons or a red bow. And the second was preferable. So it was in February Revolution, and it came to insanity. When, with a red bow, at the head of the Guards naval crew, defiled through the streets .... the emperor's cousin, Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich. The one who in 1924, in exile, proclaimed himself the Emperor of All Russia Cyril I, and whose daughter and grandson we constantly see in our country as alleged candidates for a hypothetical throne.

In late Soviet times, the bow was not quite in vogue, but carnations became a serious symbolism. Although they hung bows. Some even a lot. Like, for example, Chernenko:

Revolutionary sailors. A bunch of films showing and telling us that the sailors made the revolution. The canonical image was something like this:

But the fact is that 80% of the sailors were adherents of anarchism, and could not be ranked among the supporters of the Bolsheviks. There was just a storm, and they took part in it. And it certainly cannot be said that they were the only revolutionary force in the city. For big number ground forces The Petersburg garrison, including the Life Guards Lithuanian Regiment, took part in the rebellion. But this is exactly what happened - the revolutionary sailors later became one of the main symbols of the Revolution.

Armored car.
Why this Uberweapon was so valued in those days, I can’t fully understand :-)

Although the wheels, some kind of armor and machine guns, it was appreciated. Especially in local conflicts. Again, in the spring, when returning from emigration, Ilyich was carried precisely onto an armored car, from which he was carrying some kind of garbage. He presented the "April theses" in the evening from the balcony of the Kshesinskaya mansion, and not at the Finland Station, as is commonly believed. Although the monument is standing, and even the tower of an armored car can be seen.

That's the people all mixed up in the head :-)

Well Smolny. Until 1917, this beautiful building, built by the famous Quarenghi, housed the Smolny Institute for Noble Maidens - the first women's institute in Russia. educational institution that marked the beginning of women's education.

However, in October 1917, the institute was transferred to Novocherkassk, after which the headquarters for preparing for the Bolshevik uprising, which was led by the Petrograd Military Revolutionary Committee, was located in the empty building. In principle, this was the brain and heart of the whole revolution (rebellion). It was there that Lenin also made his way from a safe house.
The military revolutionary committee included representatives of the Central Committee, and Petrograd and military party organizations of the parties of the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries and Bolsheviks, delegates of the presidium and the soldiers' section of the Petrosoviet, representatives of the headquarters of the Red Guard, Tsentrobalt and Tsentroflot, and factory committees. As part of the VRC, the Bureau of the VRC was organized, which carried out operational work. The Bureau of the Military Revolutionary Committee included the Left Social Revolutionaries Lazimir and G. N. Sukharkov, the Bolsheviks Podvoisky and Antonov-Ovseenko. The head of the Bureau of the Military Revolutionary Committee and the Military Revolutionary Committee itself was formally headed by the Left Socialist-Revolutionary P.E. Lazimir, but often the decisions were made by the Bolsheviks: L.D. Trotsky, N.I. Podvoisky, V.A. Antonov-Ovseenko. Therefore, one can say that the uprising was led primarily by the "pariah of the revolution" Leon Trotsky.

Since 1918, the building has been occupied by city government bodies - the Leningrad City Council of Workers' Deputies and the city committee of the CPSU (b) / CPSU (until 1991). Since 1996, Smolny has been the official residence of the governor of St. Petersburg.

Here are the things.
What symbols of the Revolution do you remember?
Have a nice time of the day.