Secrets of Venus. Venus - the mysteries of the surface or is there life on Venus Mysteries of Venus

Venus is one of the most mysterious planetst in our solar system. Astrophysical research of recent decades has enriched our understanding of nature with many interesting facts. In 1995, the first exoplanet was found - a planet that orbits one of the stars in our Galaxy.

Today, more than seven hundred such exoplanets are known. Almost all of them circulate in very low orbits, but if the luminosity of the star is low, the temperature on the planet can lie in the range of 650-900 K (377-627°C). Such conditions are absolutely unacceptable for the only known protein form of life. But is it really the only one in the Universe, and the denial of other possible types of it is "earthly chauvinism"?

Exploring even the nearest of the exoplanets with the help of automatic spacecraft in the current century is unlikely to succeed. It is quite possible, however, that the answer can be found very close, on our closest neighbor in the solar system - on Venus. The temperature of the planet's surface (735 K, or 462 ° C), the enormous pressure (87-90 atm) of its gaseous envelope with a density of 65 kg / m³, consisting mainly of carbon dioxide (96.5%), nitrogen (3.5%) and traces of oxygen (less than 2 10-5%) are close to the physical conditions on many exoplanets of a special class. Recently, TV images (panoramas) of the surface of Venus, obtained thirty years ago or more, have been re-investigated and processed. They found several objects ranging in size from a decimeter to half a meter, which changed shape, position in the frame, appeared in some images and disappeared in others. And on a number of panoramas, precipitation was clearly observed, which fell and melted on the surface of the planet.

In January, the journal "Astronomical Bulletin - Research of the Solar System" published an article "Venus as a natural laboratory for the search for life at high temperatures: about the events on the planet on March 1, 1982." She did not leave readers indifferent, and opinions were divided - from extreme interest to angry disapproval, coming mainly from across the ocean. Both the then-published and this article do not claim that a hitherto unknown extraterrestrial form of life has been found on Venus, but only talks about phenomena that may be signs of it. But, as Yu.M. Gectin, “we do not like the interpretation of the obtained results as signs of life on the planet. However, we cannot find another explanation for what we see in the panoramas of the surface of Venus.”

Perhaps it is appropriate to recall the aphorism that new ideas usually go through three stages: 1. What a stupidity! 2. There is something in this ... 3. Well, who doesn't know this!

Venera spacecraft, their video cameras and the first greetings from Venus

The first panoramas of the surface of Venus were transmitted to Earth by the Venera-9 and Venera-10 spacecraft back in 1975. Images were obtained using two optical-mechanical cameras with photomultipliers installed on each device (CCD arrays existed then only as an idea).


Photo 1. The surface of Venus at the landing site of the Venera-9 apparatus (1975). Physical conditions on Venus: atmosphere CO2 96.5%, N2 3.5%, O2 less than 2 10-5; temperature - 735 K (462 ° C), pressure 92 MPa (approximately 90 atm). Daytime illumination from 400 lx to 11 klx. The meteorology of Venus is determined by sulfur compounds (SO2, SO3, H2SO4).

The pupils of the cameras were located at a height of 90 cm from the surface, on both sides of the apparatus. The swinging mirror of each camera gradually turned and created a panorama of 177 ° in width, a strip from horizon to horizon (3.3 km on flat ground), and the upper border of the image was two meters away from the camera. The resolving power of the cameras made it possible to clearly see the millimetric details of the surface near and objects about 10 meters in size near the horizon. The cameras were located inside the apparatus and filmed the surrounding landscape through a sealed quartz window. The device gradually warmed up, but its designers firmly promised half an hour of work. The processed fragment of the Venera-9 panorama is shown in photo 1. This is how a person on an expedition to Venus would see the planet.

In 1982, the Venera-13 and Venera-14 vehicles were equipped with more advanced cameras with light filters. The images were twice as sharp and consisted of 1000 vertical lines of 211 pixels each, 11 arc minutes in size. The video signal, as before, was transmitted to the orbital part of the device, an artificial satellite of Venus, which relayed data to Earth in real time. During the operation of the camera, 33 panoramas or their fragments were transmitted, which makes it possible to trace the development of some interesting phenomena on the planet.

It is impossible to convey the scale of the technical difficulties that camera developers had to overcome. Suffice it to say that over the past 37 years, the experiment has not been repeated. The team of developers was led by Doctor of Technical Sciences A.S. Selivanov, who managed to gather a group of talented scientists and engineers. We will mention here only the current Chief Designer of Space Instruments of OAO Space Systems, Candidate of Technical Sciences Yu.M. Gektin, his colleagues - Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences A.S. Panfilova, M.K. Naraev, V.P. Chemodanov. The first images from the surface of the Moon and from the orbit of Mars also transmitted the instruments they created.

On the very first panorama (Venera-9, 1975), the attention of several groups of experimenters was attracted by a symmetrical object of complex structure, about 40 centimeters in size, resembling a sitting bird with an outstretched tail. Geologists cautiously called it "a strange stone with a rod-like protrusion and a bumpy surface." "Stone" was discussed in the final collection of articles "The first panoramas of the surface of Venus" (editor M.V. Keldysh) and in a hefty volume of the international edition "VENUS". It interested me on October 22, 1975, as soon as the tape with the panorama crawled out of the bulky telegraph apparatus at the Evpatoria Center for Deep Space Communications.

Unfortunately, in the future, all my attempts to interest my colleagues at the Space Research Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences and the administration of the institute turned out to be in vain. Ideas about the impossibility of the existence of life at high temperatures turned out to be an insurmountable barrier to any discussion. Still, a year before the publication of the collection by M. V. Keldysh, in 1978, the book “Planets Rediscovered” was published, which included an image of a “strange stone”. The comment to the picture was as follows: “The details of the object are symmetrical about the longitudinal axis. Lack of clarity hides its contours, but ... with some imagination, you can see the fantastic inhabitant of Venus. On the right side of the picture... you can see an object of an outlandish shape about 30 cm in size. Its entire surface is covered with strange growths, and in their position you can see some kind of symmetry. To the left of the object protrudes a long straight white process, under which a deep shadow is visible, repeating its shape. The white process is very similar to a straight tail. On the opposite side, the object ends in a large white rounded protrusion resembling a head. The whole object rests on a short thick "paw". The resolution of the image is not enough to clearly distinguish all the details of the mysterious object ... Did Venera-9 land next to a living inhabitant of the planet? This is very hard to believe. In addition, in the eight minutes that had elapsed before the return of the camera lens to the subject, he did not change his position at all. This is strange for a living creature (unless it was damaged by the edge of the apparatus, from which it is separated by centimeters). Most likely, we see a stone of an unusual shape, similar to a volcanic bomb ... With a tail.

The sarcasm of the final phrase - "with a tail" - showed that the opponents did not convince the author of the physical impossibility of life on Venus. The same publication says: “Imagine, however, that in some of the space experiments on the surface of Venus a living creature would still be found ... The history of science shows that as soon as a new experimental fact appears, theorists, as a rule, quickly find an explanation for it. One can even predict what that explanation would be. Very heat-resistant organic compounds have been synthesized that use the energy of π-electronic bonds (one of the types of covalent bonds, the "socialization" of valence electrons of two atoms of a molecule. - Ed.). Such polymers are able to withstand temperatures up to 1000°C or more. Surprisingly, some terrestrial bacteria use π-electron bonds in their metabolism, however, not to increase heat resistance, but to fix atmospheric nitrogen (which inevitably requires a huge bond energy, reaching 10 eV or more). As you can see, nature has created “blanks” for models of Venusian living cells even on Earth.”

The author returned to this topic in the books "Planeten" and "Parade of Planets". But in his strictly scientific monograph "Planet Venus" the hypothesis of life on the planet is not mentioned, since the question of the energy sources necessary for life in an oxidizing atmosphere remained (and continues to remain) unclear.

New missions. 1982


Photo 2. Apparatus "Venera-13" on laboratory tests in 1981. In the center you can see the window of the television camera, closed by a lid.

Let's leave the "strange stone" for a while. The next successful flights to the planet with the transmission of images from its surface were the Venera-13 and Venera-14 missions in 1982. The team of the Scientific and Production Association named after. S.A. Lavochkin created amazing devices, which were then called AMS.

With each new mission to Venus, they became more and more perfect, able to withstand enormous pressures and temperatures. The device "Venera-13" (photo 2), equipped with two television cameras and other devices, sank in the equatorial zone of the planet.

Thanks to effective thermal protection, the temperature inside the devices rose rather slowly, their systems managed to transmit a lot of scientific data, high-definition panoramic images, including color, and with a low level of various interference. The transmission of each panorama took 13 minutes. On March 1, 1982, the Venera-13 descent vehicle operated for a record long time. He would have continued to transmit more, but at the 127th minute it was not clear who ordered to stop receiving data from him and why. A command was sent from Earth to turn off the receiver on the orbiter, although the descent vehicle continued to send signals ... Was it a concern for the orbiter so that the batteries on it did not run out, or something else, but didn’t the descent vehicle take priority?

Based on all the transmitted information, including that which until recently was considered corrupted by noise, the duration of the successful operation of Venera-13 on the surface exceeded two hours. The published images were created by combining color separations and black-and-white panoramas (photo 3). With a low noise level, three images were sufficient for this.


Photo 3. Panorama of the surface of Venus at the landing site of the Venera-13 spacecraft. In the center - the landing buffer of the device with the teeth of the turbulizer, which ensures a smooth landing, above - the dropped white semi-cylindrical cover of the television camera window. Its diameter is 20 cm, height 16 cm. The distance between the teeth is 5 cm.

An excess of information made it possible to restore the picture where, for a short time, the apparatus switched from surface images to transmitting the results of other scientific measurements. Published panoramas went around the world, were reprinted many times, then interest in them began to fade away; even the experts came to the conclusion that the deed has already been done ...

What can be seen on the surface of Venus

The new image analysis proved to be very time consuming. People often ask why they waited more than thirty years. No, we didn't wait. The old data has been revisited over and over again as the means of processing have improved and, shall we say, the observation and understanding of extraterrestrial objects has improved. Promising results were obtained already in 2003-2006, and the most significant finds were made in the past and the year before, and the work has not yet been completed. For research, we used sequences of primary images obtained over a sufficiently long time of operation of the apparatus. It was possible to try to detect some differences on them, to understand what caused them (for example, the wind), to detect objects that differ in appearance from the natural details of the surface, to note phenomena that escaped attention then, more than thirty years ago. During processing, the most simple and "linear" methods were used - adjusting brightness, contrast, blurring or sharpening. Any other means - retouching, adjusting, or using any version of Photoshop - was completely excluded.

The most interesting are the images transmitted by the Venera-13 spacecraft on March 1, 1982. A new analysis of images of the surface of Venus was able to detect several objects that had the features noted above. For convenience, they were given conditional names, which, of course, do not reflect their real essence.

Photo 4. The lower part of a large disk object, 0.34 m in diameter, is visible on the right at the top of the image.

A strange "disk" that changes its shape. The "disk" has a regular shape, apparently round, about 30 cm in diameter and resembles a large shell. In the fragment of the panorama in photo 4, only its lower half is visible, and the upper half is cut off by the frame border.

The position of the “disk” on subsequent images changes slightly due to a slight shift of the scanning camera when the device warms up. In photo 4, an elongated structure resembling a panicle adjoins the “disk”. Photo 5 shows sequential images of the “disk” (arrow a) and the surface near it, and the approximate moment of the passage of the scanner field over the “disk” is indicated in the lower part of the frames.

On the first two frames (32nd and 72nd minutes), the appearance of the “disk” and “panicle” almost did not change, but at the end of the 72nd minute a short arc appeared in its lower part. On the third frame (86th minute), the arc became several times longer, and the “disk” began to divide into parts.

At the 93rd minute (frame 4), the “disk” disappeared, and instead a symmetrical light object of approximately the same size appeared, formed by numerous V-shaped folds - “chevrons”, oriented approximately along the “panicle”.
Numerous large arcs, similar to the arc in the third frame, have separated from the lower part of the chevrons. They covered the entire surface adjacent to the telephotometer cover (the white half-cylinder on the surface). Unlike the “panicle”, a shadow is visible under the “chevrons”, which indicates their volume.


Photo 5. Changes in the position and shape of the objects "disk" (arrow a) and "chevrons" (arrow b). The approximate moment when the scanner passes through the “disk” image is indicated at the bottom of the frames.

After 26 minutes, on the last frame (119th minute), the “disk” and “panicle” fully recovered and are clearly visible. The chevrons and arcs disappeared as they appeared, perhaps moving beyond the border of the image. Thus, five frames of photo 5 demonstrate the full cycle of changes in the shape of the “disk” and the probable connection of the “chevrons” with both it and the arcs.

"Black flap" at the meter of soil mechanical properties. On the Venera-13 apparatus, among other devices, there was a device for measuring the strength of the soil in the form of a folding truss 60 cm long. After the apparatus landed, the latch holding the truss was released, and under the action of a spring the truss fell to the ground. The measuring cone (stamp) at its end, the kinetic energy of which was known, went deep into the soil. According to the depth of its immersion, the mechanical strength of the soil was estimated.


Photo 6. An unknown object "black patch" appeared in the first 13 minutes after landing, wrapping itself around a conical measuring hammer, which partially deepened into the ground. Details of the mechanism shine through the black object. Subsequent images (obtained between the 27th and 50th minutes after landing) show a clean surface of the hammer, there is no “black flap”.

One of the objectives of the mission was to measure the small components of the atmosphere and soil. Therefore, any separation from the apparatus of any particles, films, products of destruction or burning during descent in the atmosphere and landing was absolutely excluded; during ground tests, these requirements were given special attention. However, in the first image, obtained in the interval of 0-13 minutes after landing, it is clearly seen that around the measuring cone, along its entire height, an unknown thin object stretched upwards was wrapped around - a “black flap” about six centimeters in height (photo 6) . In subsequent panoramas taken after 27 and 36 minutes, this "black patch" is missing. It cannot be a defect in the image: on clearer images, you can see that some details of the truss are projected onto the “flap”, while others are partially visible through it. The second object of this type was found on the other side of the device, under the dropped cover of the camera. It seems that their appearance is somehow connected with the destruction of the soil by the measuring cone or the landing apparatus. This assumption indirectly confirms the observation of another similar object that appeared in the field of view of the cameras later.

The star of the screen is "scorpio". This most interesting object appeared approximately at the 90th minute along with the semicircle adjacent to it on the right (photo 7). Attention to him first of all was attracted, of course, by his strange appearance. Immediately there was an assumption that this was some kind of detail that had separated from the apparatus that had begun to collapse. But then the device would quickly fail due to the catastrophic overheating of its devices in a sealed compartment, where the red-hot atmosphere under the action of gigantic pressure would immediately penetrate. However, Venera-13 continued to operate normally for another hour, and, therefore, the object did not belong to it. According to the technical documentation, all outdoor operations - dropping the covers of sensors and TV cameras, drilling the soil, working with the measuring cone - ended half an hour after landing. Nothing else was separated from the apparatus. In the subsequent pictures, the "scorpion" is missing.


Photo 7. The "scorpion" object appeared on the image approximately 90 minutes after the spacecraft landed. It is missing from the following pictures.

In photo 7, the brightness and contrast have been adjusted, the clarity and sharpness of the original image have been increased. "Scorpion" is about 17 centimeters long and has a complex structure, reminiscent of terrestrial insects or arachnids. Its shape cannot be the result of a random combination of dark, gray and light dots. The image of the "scorpion" consists of 940 points, and in the panorama there are 2.08 105 of them. The probability of the formation of such a structure due to a random combination of points is vanishingly small: less than 10-100. In other words, the possibility of the accidental appearance of a "scorpion" is excluded. In addition, it casts a distinct shadow, and therefore it is a real object and not an artifact. A simple combination of points cannot cast a shadow.

The late appearance of the "scorpion" in the frame can be explained, for example, by the processes that took place during the landing of the device. The vertical speed of the apparatus was 7.6 m/s, and the lateral speed was approximately equal to the wind speed (0.3-0.5 m/s). The impact on the ground occurred with a reverse acceleration of 50 g of Venus. The device destroyed the soil to a depth of about 5 cm and threw it in the direction of lateral movement, filling the surface. To confirm this assumption, the place of appearance of the "scorpion" was studied in all panoramas (photo 8) and saw interesting details.


Photo 8. Sequential images of a section of soil ejected during landing in the direction of the lateral movement of the vehicle. Approximate minutes of scanning of the corresponding area are indicated.

In the first image (7th minute), a shallow groove about 10 cm long is visible in the ejected soil. In the second image (20th minute), the sides of the groove have risen, and its length has increased to about 15 cm. In the third (59th minute) the regular structure of the "scorpion" became visible in the groove. Finally, at the 93rd minute, the “scorpion” completely got out of the 1–2 cm thick layer of soil that covered it. At the 119th minute, it disappeared from the frame and is absent in subsequent images (photo 9).


Photo 9. "Scorpion" (1) appeared in the panorama, taken from the 87th to the 100th minute. On the images obtained before the 87th and after the 113th minute, it is absent. The low-contrast object 2, together with the ragged light medium, is also present only in the 87-100th minute panorama. On frames 87-100th and 113-126th minutes on the left, in a group of stones, a new object K with a changing shape appeared. He is not on the frames of the 53-66th and 79-87th minutes. The central part of the image shows the result of image processing and the size of the "scorpion".

As a possible reason for the movement of the "scorpion" in the first place, the wind was considered. Since the density of the Venusian atmosphere near the surface is ρ = 65 kg/m³, the dynamic effect of the wind is 8 times higher than on Earth. The wind speed v was measured in many experiments: by the Doppler shift of the frequency of the transmitted signal; according to the movement of dust and acoustic noise in the microphone on board - and were estimated in the range from 0.3 to 0.48 m / s. Even at its maximum value, the velocity pressure of the wind ρv² on the lateral surface area of ​​the "scorpion" creates a pressure of about 0.08 N, which could hardly have moved the object.

Another likely reason for the disappearance of the "scorpion" may be that it was moving around. As the distance from the camera moved away, the resolution of the images deteriorated, and at three or four meters it would become indistinguishable from stones. At a minimum, it should have traveled this distance in 26 minutes - the time of the next return of the scanner to the same lines in the panorama.

Due to the tilt of the camera axis, image distortions occur (photo 3). But near the camera, they are small and do not require correction. Another reason for distortion is possible - the movement of the object during scanning. It took 780 s to shoot the entire panorama, and 32 s to capture the section of the image with the "scorpion". When the object was displaced, for example, an apparent elongation or reduction in its size could occur, but, as will be shown, the fauna of Venus must be very slow.

An analysis of the behavior of the objects found in the panoramas of Venus suggests that at least some of them have signs of living beings. Taking into account this hypothesis, one can try to explain why during the first hour of the descent vehicle's operation no strange objects, except for the "black patch", were observed, and the "scorpion" appeared only an hour and a half after the landing of the vehicle.

A strong impact during landing caused the destruction of the soil and its ejection in the direction of the lateral movement of the vehicle. After landing, the device made a loud noise for about half an hour. Igniters fired off the covers of television cameras and scientific instruments, a drilling rig was working, a bar with a measuring hammer was released. The "inhabitants" of the planet, if they were there, left the dangerous area. But from the side of the ejection of soil, they did not have time to leave and were covered with it. The fact that the “scorpion” climbed out from under a centimeter blockage for about an hour and a half speaks of its low physical capabilities. The great success of the experiment was the coincidence of the scanning time of the panorama with the appearance of the "scorpion" and its proximity to the television camera, which made it possible to see both the details of the development of the described events and its appearance, although the clarity of the image leaves much to be desired. The scanning cameras of the Venera-13 and Venera-14 spacecraft were designed to capture panoramas of the vicinity of their landing sites and to obtain general ideas about the surface of the planet. But the experimenters were lucky - they managed to learn much more.

The device "Venera-14" also landed in the equatorial zone of the planet, at a distance of about 700 km from the "Venus-13". At first, the analysis of the panoramas taken by Venera-14 did not reveal any special objects. But a more detailed search yielded interesting results that are now being studied. And we will remember the first panoramas of Venus, obtained in 1975.

Missions Venera-9 and Venera-10

The results of the 1982 missions do not exhaust all available observational data. Almost seven years earlier, the less advanced Venera-9 and Venera-10 devices landed on the surface of Venus (October 22 and 25, 1975). Then, on December 21 and 25, 1978, the landing of Venera-11 and Venera-12 took place. All devices also had optical-mechanical scanning cameras, one on each side of the device. Unfortunately, only one chamber opened on Venera-9 and Venera-10, the covers of the second ones did not come off, although the cameras worked normally, and on Venera-11 and Venera-12 the covers of all of them did not come off. scanning cameras.

Compared to the Venera-13 and Venera-14 cameras, the resolution in the Venera-9 and Venera-10 panoramas was almost twice as low; .5 seconds. The shape of the spectral characteristic roughly corresponded to human vision. The Venera 9 panorama covered 174° in 29.3 minutes of filming with simultaneous transmission. Venera-9 and Venera-10 worked for 50 minutes and 44.5 minutes, respectively. The real-time image was relayed back to Earth via the orbiter's highly directional antenna. The noise level in the received images was low, but due to the limited resolution, the quality of the original panoramas, even after complex processing, left much to be desired.


Photo 10. Panorama transmitted on October 22, 1975 by the Venera-9 apparatus from the surface of the planet.

Photo. 11. Corner left part of the panorama in photo 10, where the slope of a distant hill is visible.

Photo 12. The image of the "strange stone" object (in an oval) becomes more elongated when the geometry of the "Venus-9" panorama is corrected. The central field, bounded by slanted lines, corresponds to the right side of photo 10.

At the same time, the images (the panorama of Venera-9, which was especially rich in details), succumbed to additional, very labor-intensive processing with modern means, after which they became much clearer (the lower part of photo 10 and photo 11) and quite comparable with the panoramas of Venera-13 and "Venus-14". As already noted, retouching and additions to images were completely excluded.

The Venera 9 landed on the hillside and stood at an angle of almost 10° to the horizon. On the additionally processed left part of the panorama, the distant slope of the next hill is clearly visible (photo 11). Venera-10 landed on a flat surface at a distance of 1600 km from Venera-9.

An analysis of the Venera 9 panorama revealed many interesting details. First, let's return to the image of the "strange stone". It was so "weird" that this part of the image was even put on the cover of the publication "The first panoramas of the surface of Venus."

Object "owl"

In 2003-2006, the image quality of the "strange stone" was noticeably improved. As the objects in the panoramas were studied, image processing improved as well. Similarly to the conditional names proposed above, the “strange stone” received the name “owl” for its shape. Photo 12 shows an improved result based on the corrected image geometry. The detail of the object increased, but still remained insufficient for certain conclusions. The image is based on the far right side of photo 10. The appearance of a uniformly bright sky can be deceiving, as subtle spots are visible in the original image. If we assume that here, as in photo 11, the slope of another hill is visible, then it is poorly distinguishable and should be much further away. It was necessary to significantly improve the resolution of the details of the original image.

Photo 13. The complex symmetrical shape and other features of the “strange stone” object (arrow) make it stand out against the background of the rocky surface of the planet at the landing site of Venera-9. The size of the object is about half a meter. The inset shows the object with corrected geometry.

The processed fragment of photo 10 is shown in photo 13, where the “owl” is marked with an arrow and surrounded by a white oval. It has a regular shape, pronounced longitudinal symmetry, and is difficult to interpret as a "strange stone" or "volcanic bomb with a tail." The position of the details of the "lumpy surface" reveals a certain radiality coming from the right side, from the "head". The “head” itself has a lighter shade and a complex symmetrical structure with large figured, also symmetrical dark spots and, possibly, with some kind of protrusion from above. In general, the structure of the massive "head" is difficult to understand. It is possible that some small stones, randomly matching in shades with the “head”, appear to be part of it. Correcting the geometry slightly lengthens the object, making it more "slender" (photo 13, inset). The straight light “tail” is about 16 cm long, and the entire object, together with the “tail”, reaches half a meter at a height of at least 25 cm. The shadow under its body, which is slightly raised above the surface, completely follows the contours of all its parts. Thus, the dimensions of the "owl" are quite large, which made it possible to obtain a sufficiently detailed image even with the limited resolution that the camera had, and, of course, due to the close location of the object. The question is pertinent: if in photo 13 we see not an inhabitant of Venus, then what is it? The apparent complex and highly ordered morphology of the object makes it difficult to find other suggestions.

If in the case of the "scorpion" ("Venus-13") there was some noise in the panorama, which was eliminated by known methods, then in the panorama of "Venus-9" (photo 10) there are practically no noises and do not affect the image.

Let's return to the original panorama, the details of which are clearly visible. The image with the corrected geometry and the highest resolution is shown in photo 14. There is another element here that requires the attention of the reader.

Damaged "owl"


Photo 14. The highest resolution was obtained when processing the Venera-9 panorama with corrected geometry.

During the first discussions of the results of Venera-13, one of the main questions was: how could nature on Venus do without water, which is absolutely necessary for the earth's biosphere? The critical temperature for water (when its vapor and liquid are in equilibrium and have indistinguishable physical properties) on Earth is 374°C, and under Venus conditions it is about 320°C. The temperature at the surface of the planet is about 460°C, so the metabolism of organisms on Venus (if any) must be built differently, without water. The question of alternative fluids for life under the conditions of Venus has already been considered in a number of scientific papers, and such media are known to chemists. Perhaps such a liquid is present in photo 14.

Photo 15. Panorama fragment - photo plan. A dark trail stretches from the landing buffer, which, apparently, was left behind by an organism wounded by the device. The trace is formed by some liquid substance of an unknown nature (there can be no liquid water on Venus). The object (about 20 cm in size) managed to crawl away 35 cm in no more than six minutes. The photo plan is convenient because it allows you to compare and measure the real sizes of objects.

From the place on the torus of the Venera-9 landing buffer, marked with an asterisk in photo 14, a dark trail stretches to the left along the surface of the stone. Then it leaves the stone, expands and ends at a light object, similar to the “owl” discussed above, but half the size, about 20 cm. There are no other similar traces in the image. One can guess the origin of the trace, which begins directly at the landing buffer of the apparatus: the object was partially crushed by the buffer and, crawling away, left a dark trace of a liquid substance released from its damaged tissues (photo 15). For terrestrial animals, such a trail would be called bloody. (Thus, the first victim of "Earth aggression" on Venus dates back to October 22, 1975.) Until the sixth minute of the scan, when the object appeared in the image, it managed to crawl about 35 cm. Knowing the time and distance, it can be established that its speed was not less than 6 cm/min. In photo 15, between the large stones where the affected object is located, you can distinguish its shape and other features.

A dark trail indicates that such objects, even damaged ones, are capable of moving at a speed of at least 6 cm / min in case of serious danger. If the "scorpion", which has already been mentioned, between the 93rd and 119th minutes really moved away at a distance of at least one meter, beyond the camera's visibility, then its speed was at least 4 cm / min. At the same time, comparing photo 14 with other fragments of images transmitted by Venera-9 in seven minutes, it can be seen that the “owl” in photo 13 has not moved. Some objects found in other panoramas (which are not considered here) also remained motionless. It is most likely that such “slowness” is caused by their limited energy reserves (“scorpion”, for example, spent an hour and a half on a simple operation of its own rescue) and the slow movements of the Venusian fauna are normal for it. Note that the energy availability of the terrestrial fauna is very high, which is facilitated by the abundance of flora for food and the oxidizing atmosphere.

In this regard, we should return to the object "owl" in photo 13. The ordered structure of its "lumpy surface" resembles small folded wings, and the "owl" rests on a "paw" similar to a bird's. The density of the atmosphere of Venus at the surface level is 65 kg m³. Any fast movement in such a dense environment is difficult, but flight would require very small wings, a little more than the fins of fish, and insignificant energy expenditure. However, there is not enough evidence to assert that the object belongs to birds, and whether the inhabitants of Venus fly is still unknown. But they seem to be attracted to certain meteorological phenomena.

"Snowfall" on Venus

So far, nothing has been known about atmospheric precipitation on the surface of the planet, except for the possibility of the formation and fallout of aerosols from pyrite, lead sulfide, or other compounds high in the Maxwell Mountains. The latest panoramas of Venera 13 show many white dots covering a significant part of them. The points were considered noise, loss of information. For example, when the signal transmitted in the negative is lost from one point in the image, a white dot appears in its place. Each such point is a pixel, either lost due to a malfunction of the heated equipment, or missing due to a brief loss of radio communication between the descent vehicle and the orbital repeater. When processing the panorama in 2011, the white dots were replaced by the averaged values ​​of adjacent pixels. The image became clearer, but there were many small white spots. They consisted of several pixels and were, rather, not interference, but something real. Even in raw images, it is clear that for some reason there are almost no dots on the black body of the device that fell into the frame, and the image itself and the moment the interference appeared are in no way connected. Unfortunately, everything turned out to be more complicated. In the grouped images below, noise occurs on a close dark background. Moreover, they are rare, but still found on telemetry inserts, when the broadcast of the panorama was periodically replaced by data transmission from other scientific instruments for eight seconds. Therefore, the panoramas show both precipitation and interference of electromagnetic origin. The latter is confirmed by the fact that the use of a light "blur" operation sharply improves the image, eliminating precisely point noise. But the origin of electrical interference remains unknown.


Photo 16. Chronological sequence of images with meteorological phenomena. The time indicated on the panoramas is counted from the start of scanning the top image. At first, the entire initially clean surface was covered with white spots, then, over the next half hour, the area of ​​precipitation decreased by at least half, and the soil under the “melted” mass acquired a dark shade, like earth soil moistened with melted snow.

Comparing these facts, we can conclude that meteorological phenomena were partly taken for noise - precipitation resembling terrestrial snow, and their phase transitions (melting and evaporation) on the surface of the planet and on the apparatus itself. Photo 16 shows four such consecutive panoramas. Precipitation occurred, apparently, in short intense gusts, after which the area of ​​precipitation decreased by at least half over the next half hour, and the ground under the "melted" mass darkened, like moistened earth soil. Since the surface temperature at the landing point is set (733 K), and the thermodynamic properties of the atmosphere are known, the main conclusion of the observation is that there are very severe restrictions on the nature of the precipitated solid or liquid substance. Of course, the composition of "snow" at 460°C is a big mystery. However, there are probably very few substances that have a critical pT point (when they exist simultaneously in three phases) in a narrow temperature range near 460 ° C and at a pressure of 9 MPa, and among them are aniline and naphthalene. The described meteorological phenomena occurred after the 60th or 70th minute. At the same time, the “scorpion” appeared and some other interesting phenomena arose that have yet to be described. The conclusion involuntarily suggests itself that the Venusian life is waiting for precipitation, like rain in the desert, or, conversely, avoids them.

The possibility of life in conditions similar to moderately high temperatures (733 K) and the carbon dioxide atmosphere of Venus has been considered more than once in the scientific literature. The authors came to the conclusion that its presence on Venus, for example, in microbiological forms, is not excluded. Life was also considered, which could evolve in slowly changing conditions from the early stages of the planet's history (with conditions closer to Earth) to modern ones. The temperature range near the surface of the planet (725-755 K, depending on the relief), of course, is absolutely unacceptable for terrestrial life forms, but if you think about it, thermodynamically it is no worse than terrestrial conditions. Yes, the media and active chemical agents are unknown to us, but no one was looking for them. Chemical reactions at high temperatures are very active; The source materials on Venus are not much different from those on Earth. There are many known anaerobic organisms. Photosynthesis in a number of protozoa is based on a reaction when hydrogen sulfide H2S turns out to be an electron donor, and not water. In many species of autotrophic prokaryotes living underground, chemosynthesis is used instead of photosynthesis, for example 4H2 + CO2 → CH4 + H2O. There are no physical prohibitions on life at high temperatures, except, of course, "earthly chauvinism." Of course, photosynthesis at high temperatures and in an oxidizing environment should, apparently, be based on completely different, unknown biophysical mechanisms.

But what energy sources, in principle, could be used by life in the Venusian atmosphere, where sulfur compounds, and not water, play the main role in meteorology? The detected objects are quite large, they are not microorganisms. It is most natural to assume that they, like terrestrial ones, exist due to vegetation. Although the direct rays of the Sun due to a powerful cloud layer, as a rule, do not reach the surface of the planet, there is enough light for photosynthesis. On Earth, diffuse illumination of 0.5-7 kilolux is quite enough for photosynthesis even in the depths of dense tropical forests, and on Venus it lies in the range of 0.4-9 kilolux. But if this article gives some idea about the possible fauna of Venus, then it is impossible to judge the flora of the planet from the available data. It seems that some of its signs can be found in other panoramas.

Regardless of the specific biophysical mechanism acting on the surface of Venus, at temperatures of incident T1 and outgoing T2 radiation, the thermodynamic efficiency of the process (efficiency ν = (T1 - T2)/T1) should be somewhat lower than the Earth’s, since T2 = 290 K for the Earth and T2 = 735 K for Venus. In addition, due to the strong absorption of the blue-violet part of the spectrum in the atmosphere, the maximum solar radiation on Venus is shifted to the green-orange region and, according to Wien's law, corresponds to a lower effective temperature T1 = 4900 K (at the Earth T1 = 5770 K). In this respect, Mars has the most favorable conditions for life.

Conclusion on the mysteries of Venus

In connection with the interest in the possible habitability of a certain class of exoplanets with a moderately high surface temperature, the results of television studies of the surface of Venus, carried out in the Venera-9 missions in 1975 and Venera-13 in 1982, were carefully considered. The planet Venus was considered as a natural high-temperature laboratory. Along with previously published images, panoramas that were not previously included in the main processing were studied. They show appearing, changing or disappearing objects of noticeable sizes, from a decimeter to half a meter, the random appearance of images of which cannot be explained. Possible evidence was found that some of the found objects with a complex regular structure were partially covered with soil ejected during the landing of the apparatus, and were slowly released from it.

An interesting question is: what sources of energy could life use in the high-temperature, non-oxidizing atmosphere of the planet? It is assumed that, like the Earth, the source of existence of the hypothetical fauna of Venus should be its hypothetical flora, which carries out photosynthesis of a special type, and some of its samples can be found on other panoramas.

The television cameras of the Venus apparatus were not intended to film the possible inhabitants of Venus. A special mission to search for life on Venus would have to be substantially more complex.

Venus- a planet that is compared with the Earth and is even called the "Sister of the Earth." Venus is very similar to Earth, both planets are almost the same size and mass, and the age of these planets is approximately 4.5 billion years. On Venus, there are some of the conditions for the formation of life: Atmosphere, the optimal position from the Sun (the distance at which water on the planet can not freeze and not evaporate in a normal environment). And nothing prevented life from arising on this planet, according to scientists, there were even oceans there, but this either did not happen, or civilization died out due to a number of factors.

Secrets of Venus. Mystery #1

The secret is that it has a strong greenhouse effect, which is now gaining momentum on. Now Venus is a hellish planet, the temperature on its surface is about 500ºC, the temperature here is even higher than on the planet closest to the Sun - Mercury. This is due to the greenhouse effect. Venus has very dense clouds, these clouds let light through to the surface and prevent it from reflecting back into space. Because of this, the temperature on the planet is rising, and the temperature has also risen due to the large number of active volcanoes, at least 100,000 volcanoes (there are about 1,500 volcanoes on Earth). Therefore, it is impossible to be on the planet and life here is impossible.

Secrets of Venus. Mystery #2

Venus is a very mysterious planet and one of these mysteries is wrong axis of rotation of the planet. All planets in the solar system rotate around their axis in the same direction in which they rotate around the sun - counterclockwise. Venus ignores this and rotates clockwise around its axis. But then, a planet was found - Uranus, which also rotates clockwise. Scientists explain this by saying that the planet collided with some kind of cosmic body, which influenced the rotation of the planet.

Secrets of Venus. Mystery #3

Another of the mysteries of Venus is the relationship between day and year on the planet. We are all used to the fact that in one year (in one revolution of the planet around the Sun) there are several days (one revolution of the planet around its axis), and Venus does not behave like other planets. Here a year is less than a day. A year on Venus lasts 224 Earth days, and a day is equal to 244 Earth days. It turns out that a day on Venus lasts longer than one year. Also, the secret of Venus is in the absence of natural satellites. Was there ever only one quasi-satellite known now (a space body that entered the orbit of the planet for some time).

Secrets of Venus. Mystery #4

Is life possible on Venus? After all the above facts about the planet, we can safely say that there is no intelligent life on Venus. Due to the very hot temperature, it is simply impossible to live on, there can be no water here due to such extreme temperatures. Days on Venus are very long, so to live on Venus you need to adapt to 240 days and 240 nights, which is not easy to do. Due to the large volcanic activity, Venus, in fact, is covered only with solidified lava and it will not be possible to grow anything here. But, according to scientists, life on Venus can safely develop at an altitude of 50 km from the surface. The temperature there is about 70ºC, at such an altitude there may be some protozoa.

Mysterious Venus

And although Venus has already revealed many amazing features to astronomers, nevertheless, despite the fact that it is located next to the Earth, it still keeps a lot of mystery and mystery.

One of the mysteries is related to the problem of life on Venus. But since this has already been discussed, we will not touch on this problem, but will immediately move on to the next Venusian riddle - the rotation of the planet around its own axis. It, as we know, does not occur in the same way as in other planets of the solar system, including the Earth, but in the opposite direction.

Venus continues to be a mystery to researchers

This means that the cosmonaut of the future, who will be on Venus, will see an unusual picture for an earthling: the Sun here rises in the west, and sets in the east.

At one time, it was believed that such a feature is characteristic only of Venus. However, over time, it turned out that Uranus also rotates differently from the rest of its neighbors in the solar system.

But why these two planets, contrary to the rest, demonstrate such a striking originality, astronomers cannot answer, although several assumptions have been put forward to explain this phenomenon. The two main versions suggest either a collision with a giant meteorite, or some unknown processes in the cores of these planets.

Another mystery of Venus is that it rotates too slowly around its axis and too fast around the Sun. Indeed, a day on Venus is 244 times longer than on Earth. At the same time, the Venusian year lasts only 224.7 Earth days. That is, a year on Venus is shorter than a day!

Scientists suggest that in the early stages of evolution, the day on Venus was much shorter. However, due to some processes, the rotation of the planet slowed down, which led to the current state of things.

The probe "Venus Express" on approach to the planet discovered another mysterious phenomenon. In the photographs received from space, it is clearly seen that in the atmosphere of the planet above its South Pole there is a giant black funnel. It seems that atmospheric clouds are twisted into a giant spiral, which goes inside the planet through a huge hole. That is, Venus is a hollow sphere.

Of course, scientists do not seriously think about the existence of an entrance leading to the underworld of Venus, but the mysterious spiral vortices above the pole of the planet are still waiting for their explanation.

In addition, this strange atmospheric formation has two centers that are intricately connected to each other. But it is known that almost any atmospheric vortex is formed around a certain center in which there is no rotation.

Scientists cannot yet solve another riddle of Venus: why does its atmosphere rotate 60 times faster than the planet itself?

As, however, and the nature of a strange bright spot that appeared in 2009 on its surface. What contributed to the appearance of this giant "freckle": volcanic activity or turbulent eddies in the atmosphere is still unknown.

Or maybe the reason is completely different? For example, the appearance of a spot could be caused by the solar wind: the stream of charged particles ejected by the Sun, when interacting with the upper layers of the Venusian atmosphere, could well contribute to its appearance.

But, at least judging by the fact that the spot is especially visible in the ultraviolet, it did not appear as a result of a meteorite fall.

It should be said that spots on Venus have been observed not for the first time and not for the first decade, and yet it has not yet been possible to unambiguously explain their nature.

Our “neighbor” demonstrated another mysterious phenomenon to scientists in 2008. It was at this time that the researchers of the Universe in the atmosphere of Venus discovered a strange luminous fog, which, having existed for only a few days, disappeared just as unexpectedly as it appeared. Astronomers believe that on other planets, including on Earth, this phenomenon is most likely absent. Most likely, it is a certain feature that is characteristic only for the atmosphere of Venus.

Before that, in July 2007, several cases of bright glow were also noted in the southern hemisphere of the planet. And just a few days later, similar but brighter glows were detected in the equatorial regions of Venus.

What is the reason for this incomprehensible phenomenon, scientists do not yet know. True, today it is still known that all these phenomena appeared in the upper layers of the atmosphere in areas adjacent to the equator, and also that they do not have a clear period.

In addition, there are hypotheses in this regard. Most likely, scientists believe that a strange glow occurs due to the high density of the Venusian atmosphere, which contains a lot of dissolved sulfuric acid. Especially a lot of it in the clouds, which are located at a height of 70 kilometers above the surface of Venus. Atmospheric processes occurring in these layers of the Venusian atmosphere lead to the appearance of sulfuric acid vapors, which rise even higher. It is there that under the influence of sunlight they begin to glow.

It’s just not clear what mechanisms cause sulfur oxide and water to rise to such great heights and interact there. Astronomers suggest that unknown processes occurring on the surface of Venus may contribute to this.

So, the planet closest to us keeps secrets, the solution of which is not yet subject to man.

From the book Encyclopedic Dictionary (B) author Brockhaus F. A.

Venus Venus (lat. Venus) is one of the 12 deities of the Greco-Roman Olympus, Aphrodite among the Hellenes, the goddess of love and beauty, the mother of Cupid (Eros), the queen of nymphs and graces. According to Homer, Aphrodite, the daughter of Zeus and Dione, has a belt that can make any woman or goddess “beautiful,

From the book Unexplained Phenomena author

Venus Venus is one of the major planets already known in antiquity; of all the celestial bodies, V. is second in brightness only to the sun and moon; sometimes it gives a faintly visible shadow, sometimes it is visible even during the day. The orbit of Venus lies inside the orbit of the earth, as a result of which the angular

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (BE) of the author TSB

A MYSTERIOUS DEATH IN A CLOSED ROOM Mrs. Lochlan Smith heard screams and struggles coming from the Laundromat on Fifth Avenue in New York and called the police. But when the police arrived, they saw that the laundry was closed. Only a small window was open, and

From the book 100 great mysteries of the XX century author Nepomniachtchi Nikolai Nikolaevich

From the book Mythological Dictionary author Archer Vadim

From the book Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions author Serov Vadim Vasilievich

From the book of 100 famous disasters author

Venus (Roman) - the ancient Roman goddess of gardens, later identified with Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love, considered the mother of Aeneas, the legendary founder of the Roman state. Mother of the god of love, little Cupid. Later, V. was identified with oriental goddesses

From the book 100 great secrets of the Earth author Volkov Alexander Viktorovich

Venus From ancient Roman mythology. Venus (Greek - Aphrodite) - the goddess of love and beauty. A common noun for a beautiful

From the book 100 great curiosities of history author Vedeneev Vasily Vladimirovich

From the book of 100 famous mystical phenomena author Sklyarenko Valentina Markovna

The mysterious power of mountains Since ancient times, people settled their deities on mountain peaks. You can recall the ancient Olympus or Mount Sinai, where Moses received his "tablets of revelation." Recall the Japanese Mount Fuji, which is revered in the national religion - Shintoism

From the book Popular Astrologer author Shalashnikov Igor

The most mysterious map in the world Usually in Iceland they talk about fish, which is quite natural for an island whose economy "rests on the back of a herring." However, in recent years, a quarter of a million inhabitants of the "ice country" are discussing the events of a thousand years ago and glorious

From the book 100 great secrets of the East [with illustrations] author Nepomniachtchi Nikolai Nikolaevich

Lei - a mysterious "web" A mysterious "web" of imaginary straight lines, which supposedly connects the most significant prehistoric and medieval objects of Britain. The idea of ​​the existence of lei originated more than 85 years ago. One Alfred Watkins, an amateur archaeologist,

From the book Secrets of Hidden Control of Men author Kriksunova Inna Abramovna

Venus Did you know that Venus was originally considered in Roman mythology as the goddess of flowering gardens, spring, fertility, growth and flowering of all the fruitful forces of nature. A little later, Venus became identified with the Greek Aphrodite. In this regard, since

From the book Encyclopedia of Classical Greco-Roman Mythology author Obnorsky V.

Venus is a planet forgotten by us, which is finally remembered. The people were too carried away by Mars and its mysteries, leaving the riddles of the Morning Star for later. The Venus Express space mission is an attempt to unravel the mysteries of the planet after more than 10 years of oblivion. But, as expected, these mysteries were not so much dealt with as they stumbled upon new mysteries.

There are two reasons why, of all the terrestrial planets, Venus continues to be the focus of researchers' attention. First, as the closest analogue of the Earth, it can be considered as one of its limiting models; secondly, Venus can serve as a unique testing ground for experiments on active influence on climate processes on a global scale. A purely terrestrial, utilitarian problem is directly related to Venus - to find the limits of regulation in natural-climatic mechanisms and relationships, beyond which the continuously expanding anthropogenic impacts on the climate could turn out to be irreversible. Naturally, the question of what led to the development of such specific natural conditions on Venus comes to the fore. Were they predetermined by the natural nature of the primary fractionation of the substance of the interior of Venus or by subsequent evolution, due to the proximity of the planet to the Sun?

Venus has been known to science since prehistoric times. It is the brightest object in the sky after the Sun and Moon. Among the countless myriads twinkling in the night sky, no star shines so amazingly as the planet Venus, even Sirius-Sothis, the dog-star, is inferior to her. Venus is the queen among our planets, the crown jewel of our solar system. “Light-bearing” Venus (also Aphrodite in the Greek tradition) appeared on the horizon in the pre-dawn hour, foreshadowing the imminent light of a white day. In the sky, Venus in its mysterious, alluring brilliance appears before the earthly observer either in the evening or in the morning, and in ancient times people took it for two stars: evening - Vesper and morning - Lucifer. However, already the ancient Greek scientist Pythagoras knew that in reality it was one star. Later, this star was given the name of the goddess of love and beauty - Venus, who embodied the image of a beautiful woman. Venus was the patroness of flowering gardens, the goddess of spring, fertility, growth and flowering of all the fruitful forces of nature.

VENUS IN MYTHS AND LEGEND OF ANCIENT

Mythological knowledge will always come in handy, because Greek and Roman mythology has entered modern life, and every cultured person needs to get acquainted with it:

Many expressions from ancient mythology are still found today: “Sisyphean labor”, “Ariadne's thread”, “apple of discord”, “Trojan horse”, etc.;

Architects resort to the symbolism of myths - over the Bolshoi Theater in Moscow and the Pushkin Drama Theater in St. Petersburg, quadrigas with a bronze Apollo, the patron of the arts, rush; mighty Atlanteans support the portico of the Hermitage;

The gods and heroes of ancient Greece and Rome are reminded by the marble statues of the Summer Garden, Peterhof Park, the estate in Arkhangelsk and other museums of the world;

The names of some months (January, March, May, June) are reminiscent of the Roman gods - Janus, Mars, Maya, Juno;

The names of mythological characters are the planets of the solar system:

Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto;

The best paintings, which are kept in art galleries, museums, private collections and are the property of civilization, are written on mythological subjects.

The Birth of Venus, William Adolphe Bougereau

To understand the plots and meaning of works of art, the museum visitor must be familiar with the basics of ancient mythology. Without familiarizing yourself with the ancient myths, it is impossible even to read the works of the great Russian poet A. S. Pushkin, where such expressions as “Parnassus shine on the heights”, “On the light games of Terpsichore”, “The charming minion of Cyprida”, “Centaur avenging gift” are mentioned , "A gift of Bacchus dear", "Flies like fluff from the mouth of Eol", "like a windy Venus".

Venus in Roman mythology was originally the goddess of spring and gardens, perhaps the personification of the concept of venia - the grace of the gods. Due to the popularity of the legend about Aeneas, she became identified with his legendary mother, Aphrodite, as the goddess of love and beauty, was especially revered as the patroness of Aeneas's descendants - the Romans. According to her famous temple in Sicily on Mount Eryx, she bore the epithet Erucina. Gaius Julius Caesar revered her as the progenitor of the Julius family (Genetrix). In literature, first of all - the goddess of love passion, the mother of Cupid. In late Rome, her cult merges with the orgiastic cults of Astarte, Isis, Cybele, and others. In connection with the cult of Attis, the veneration of the dying and resurrecting beloved of Venus, Adonis, becomes especially popular. The cult of Venus reached its apotheosis of popularity in the 1st century BC. e. when the famous senator Sulla, who believed that the goddess brings him happiness, and Gaius Pompey, who built a temple and dedicated it to Venus the victor, began to count on her patronage.

Venus was awarded such epithets as merciful, cleansing, shorn, in memory of the courageous Roman women who, during the war with the Gauls, cut their hair in order to weave ropes out of them. In literary works, Venus acted as the goddess of love and passion, among the Greeks - Aphrodite; among the Babylonians - Ishtar. The name of the planet comes, apparently, from the fact that Venus is the brightest of the planets known to the ancients. To designate the Sun, Moon and planets, astronomers use signs of very ancient origin. The sign of Venus is the image of a hand mirror - the emblem of femininity and beauty: ♀.

BEAUTY VENUS IMITATES CINTHIA.

Venus is the closest planet to us. By observing Venus, scientists have found that it moves around the Sun in an almost circular orbit at an average distance from it of 108 million kilometers. The period of the orbital motion of Venus (Venusian year) is equal to 224.7 Earth days. It is now known that Venus rotates around its axis in the opposite direction - from east to west, and not from west to east, like the Earth and most other planets. The consequence of this is that the Sun rises and sets twice on the planet's horizon during the Venusian year. To an observer on the surface of Venus, the Sun rises in the west and sets in the east, although in reality the cloudy atmosphere completely covers the sky. This is one of the mysteries of Venus. The unusual rotation of Venus is that it is very slow (one Venusian day is equal to 243 Earth days, which is slightly longer than the Venusian year). In addition, the orbital and daily periods of rotation of Venus are synchronized in such a way that it always turns the same side to the Earth when the planets are at a minimum distance from each other. We do not know if this is due to resonance or a coincidence - this is also the mystery of Venus. In its orbital motion, it periodically occupies two diametrically opposite positions relative to the Sun and the Earth, called the lower conjunction, when Venus is between the Sun and the Earth, and the upper conjunction, when the Sun is between the Earth and Venus. The mutual position of the Earth, Venus and the Sun in inferior conjunction, when they are located on the same straight line, is called the phenomenon of the passage of Venus through the disk of the Sun (transit of Venus across the disk of the Sun) - (APPENDIX). This picture can be observed even with the naked eye. However, not everyone can become a witness of this phenomenon, since the frequency of the passage of Venus is 8 and 105.5; 8 and 121.5 years. In the last century, this phenomenon was observed on December 9, 1874 and December 8, 1882. And only on June 8, 2004 and June 6, 2012 it will happen again.

Venus is visible to the naked eye and you can observe the change in its phases. In 1610, the Italian astronomer Galileo, observing Venus through a spyglass, first discovered and described a sequential change in its phases, similar to the Moon. He was not at first sure of the correctness of his observation and did not dare to report it openly. Therefore, Galileo encrypted the message of his discovery into a Latin anagram phrase, and only later, finally convinced of the correctness of his assumption, did he decipher it, rearranging the letters in it: “The mother of love imitates the views of Cynthia.” The mother of love is the goddess Venus, and Cynthia is one of the ancient names for the moon. Galileo's observation of this phenomenon was an important proof of Copernicus' well-known heliocentric theory of the solar system.

In lower conjunction, when Venus is at its closest distance from the Earth, it always faces us with its unlit side, and therefore its largest phase is completely invisible to us. Departing from this position of "new Venus", the planet takes the form of a sickle, the diameter of which is the smaller, the wider the sickle. They say that the famous mathematician K. Gauss, once observing Venus through a telescope on a balcony, called his elderly mother, hoping to amaze her with the appearance of the phases of the planet. To his surprise, his mother, clinging to the eyepiece and not at all surprised, asked only why the "horns" of the sickle were turned in the wrong direction. As it turned out, the woman had seen Venus all her life in the form of a crescent (and the telescope, as you know, gives an inverted image)! So, everyone, having checked the conditions of visibility of the planets, can check their vision during periods when Venus has a small crescent phase (near the lower conjunction with the Sun). But we warn you: this test is very tough, if you don’t see a sickle - better take binoculars, at least theatrical ones!

ATMOSPHERE OF THE PLANET: HISTORY OF DISCOVERY.

This planet is one of the most beautiful luminaries in the sky. During periods of favorable visibility of the planet, it is impossible to confuse it in the sky with anything because of its great brightness (astronomers say - "brilliance"). Perhaps only against the background of dawn - with Jupiter, and even then, perhaps for the first time, since the difference in the color of the luminaries is significant. Jupiter has a distinct yellowish hue, while Venus appears completely white to most observers. Venus is sometimes called one of the most mysterious planets in the solar system: a dense cloud cover envelops its surface. The atmosphere on Venus was first discovered by M. B. Lomonosov. In 1761, the first Russian academician Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov, observing Venus at the time of its passage across the solar disk, first discovered a powerful atmosphere near the planet, as described in his work “The phenomenon of Venus on the Sun observed at the St. Petersburg Imperial Mayan Academy of Sciences on the 26th day of 1761 ”Wrote: “According to these notes, Mr. Councilor Lomonosov argues that the planet Venus is surrounded by a noble airy atmosphere, such [if only not more] than it pours around our globe of the earth.” This phenomenon is later, already in the twentieth century. , was called the Lomonosov phenomenon. The atmosphere of Venus turned out to be so “noble” that even modern powerful optical telescopes are unable to look behind its dense cloudy curtain, which, like the veil of an oriental beauty, hides its appearance from us.

But what does the atmosphere of Venus consist of and what are its clouds, which, reflecting sunlight well, make this planet the brightest luminary in the sky (of course, except for the Sun and Moon)? These questions remained unanswered for a long time. On Venus, the pressure of the atmosphere on the surface reaches 90 atmospheres (i.e., the same as the pressure in the oceans of the Earth at a depth of 1 km). The atmosphere of the planet consists mainly of carbon dioxide, dust and acid vapors. It is impossible to see the surface of Venus, since it is covered with an impenetrable many-kilometer veil of clouds. Due to such a dense atmosphere, an extremely powerful greenhouse effect operates on the planet, as a result of which the surface temperature of Venus rises from 400K to 740K (the melting point of lead). The gaseous envelope of Venus is a giant greenhouse. It is able to let in solar heat, but does not let it out, absorbs the radiation of the planet itself. Absorbers are carbon dioxide and droplets of concentrated (75-80%) sulfuric acid. A few years ago, French scientists discovered traces of hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acid vapors and even carbon monoxide in the atmosphere of Venus. The presence of these substances could indicate active volcanic activity. The continuous cloudiness and proximity of Venus to the Sun suggested to scientists that the climatic conditions on this planet are similar to those that were on Earth during the Carboniferous period of its history. Then, under the clouds in the humid atmosphere of the Earth, a greenhouse, hothouse climate was created and powerful vegetation rapidly developed. Measurements of radio emissions from Venus carried out in recent years have dealt a severe blow to these ideas. Repeated many times, they said that the physical conditions on this planet are completely unsuitable for life. It is prohibitively hot there: it is hotter on Venus than on Mercury, despite the fact that it is almost twice as far from the Sun. The dense cloud cover is highly reflective (which explains the brightness of Venus) and poorly transmits solar thermal radiation.

However, there is a hypothesis according to which the lower part of the Venusian atmosphere up to 20 kilometers high is filled with dust particles. And since the clouds are white, this hypothesis suggests that the dust is a white powder of carbonates (calcium and magnesium). Venus probably once had large water reserves, just like Earth, but all the water has evaporated and Venus is now completely dry. The Earth would have met the same fate if it had been a little closer to the Sun. We can learn a lot about the Earth by trying to understand why Venus, which was similar in basic parameters, became completely different.

So, the landscape of Venus appears before us inhospitable, unattractive: there is no water on the surface - all the moisture is in a heavy and thick atmosphere saturated with carbon dioxide, almost devoid of oxygen. The sun and stars are hidden by dense clouds. There is neither winter nor summer: quiet, dark, hot.

SURFACE AND RELIEF OF VENUS.

No details on the surface of Venus are visible even in the largest telescopes. The atmosphere of the planet is so dense that even from spacecraft only the movement of large clouds is noticeable. The relief of the planet consists of vast plains intersected by mountain ranges and plateau-type elevations. The mountainous regions look like earthly continents. The two "continents" of Venus - the Land of Ishtar and the Land of Aphrodite - are comparable in area to the continental United States. The land of Ishtar is distinguished by the Maxwell mountains, which rise 11 km above the average level, i.e. they are higher than the earthly Everest. Along the eastern edge of Aphrodite's Land, two rift valleys extend for 2200 km, located below the average level of the Venusian surface. The Beta mountain region consists of two huge shield-shaped volcanoes, similar to the volcanoes of the Hawaiian Islands. They, like their terrestrial counterparts, rise to 4000 m, but are much larger in area. Lowlands, similar to the ocean basins of the Earth, occupy only a sixth of the planet's surface. There are also impact craters on Venus, similar to those on the moon. For large meteorites, asteroids and comet nuclei, even a dense atmosphere is not an obstacle. On satellite images, it was possible to see some unexpected aspects of the process of formation of impact craters under the conditions of Venus. It turned out that some of the ejecta from many craters conducts as a liquid substance, forming, usually directed in one direction from the crater, extensive streams tens of kilometers long, and sometimes more. It is not clear that this is a flowing superheated impact melt or a suspension of fine-grained solid matter and melt droplets suspended in a dense (65 kg/m3) gas of the near-surface atmosphere.

Data from the radar of the Magellan spacecraft shows that most of the surface of Venus is covered with lava flows. The volcanism of Venus indicates the activity of its bowels. However, manifestations of this activity are not of a global nature. On Venus, liquid mantle flows are blocked by thick basaltic crust and most of them do not reach the surface. Venus should have a liquid iron core, but there is no movement of matter - there is no movement of charged particles, that is, no electric current, which means that the planet's own magnetic field should not arise. However, the results of space research bring a new unexpected look at this problem. Although Venus does not have a magnetic field of its own, the interplanetary magnetic field carried by the solar wind creates an "envelope" around it and prevents this wind from penetrating deep into the atmosphere. Measurements made with the MAG magnetometer showed that the field "wraps" around the day side of the atmosphere and "bends" to the night side, and the field configuration there is such that it most likely contributes to plasma acceleration. And this leads to the loss of atmospheric ions. For the first time it was possible to conduct direct observations of the plasma environment of the planet during the minimum of solar activity. The picture of interaction with the solar wind that scientists saw is very different from the observations already made at solar maximum. With a few exceptions, all the details of the landscape on Venus are named after women.

There are old volcanoes on Venus, but whether there are active ones is unknown. But volcanism, according to one version, is the reason for the highest concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and, consequently, the greenhouse effect. The lower atmosphere, which consists mainly of carbon dioxide, is so thick that it is only slightly inferior to water in areas - it is a hot bare rocky desert, on others - mountains, craters, stones, giant cracks. Dense multi-kilometer clouds of sulfuric acid mixed with chlorine and fluorine compounds, making the planet shining when viewed from the outside, and twilight when viewed from the observer's surface. Hot and dry stony valleys, ancient volcanoes, mountain peaks covered with metal "frost". Needless to say, Venus is a very exotic place. But there is reason to believe that in the distant past, there could have been enough water on Venus for the origin of life.

"Venus is more like Earth than Mars," says David Grinspoon, a space scientist at the Boulder Research Institute in Colorado and another prominent proponent of the thesis that Venus's acid clouds could contain droplets with life. Moreover, many newly discovered exoplanets will probably resemble Venus. We must carefully study our nearest neighbor. "

SPACE VEHICLES PENETrate THE MYSTERIES OF VENUS.

The study of Venus with the help of spacecraft began in our country back in the 60s with attempts to deliver a research probe to this planet and make measurements in its atmosphere and on the surface. In 1961, the first space robots of our country were sent to the planet: "Venus-1, - 2". In 1962, the Mariner-2 spacecraft visited Venus. In total, Venus was explored by more than 20 spacecraft, and the first interplanetary stations "Venus - 9, - 10", which landed on another planet and received the first photographs of its surface. In the images of Venera-15, -16, extended cracks of unknown origin were found. It remains a mystery what fluid cut through these channels. The easiest way would be to assume that they are the result of thermal erosion by the current flow of basaltic lava. But calculations show that on a path 7000 km long, the basalt lava flow will not have enough heat reserves to flow non-stop and melt the substance of the basalt plain, cutting a channel in it. Most likely these are exotic liquids like molten sulfur carbonates.

An important stage in space research is the exploration of the planet by the Venus Express spacecraft launched on November 9, 2005 from the Baikonur cosmodrome. The flight to Venus lasted 155 days. The duration of the main mission was 500 Earth (slightly more than two Venusian) days. The planet's atmosphere became the main object of study for the ʺVenus Expressʺ instruments, since it is precisely this that is the key to understanding the mysteries of Venus. In March 2007, the Venus Express mission was extended until May 2009 for two more Venusian days. Most likely, the probe will carry out its scientific mission further - it will have enough fuel resources until 2013. Other space stations will soon join it: in 2010, the Japanese Venus Climate Orbiter should arrive at Venus. By comparing the data obtained by both missions, more information about the Morning Star can be obtained.

The European interplanetary station ʺVenus Expressʺ received new data describing the dynamics of clouds on Venus. The planet was found to have a weak magnetic field, similar to the Earth's magnetic field, but much smaller. On November 28, 2007, at a press conference at the headquarters of the European Space Agency (ESA), the results of the main mission of the European interplanetary probe were officially presented. The apparatus detected a bright, uniform haze rich in sulfuric acid. It is formed when, through an unknown process, water vapor and sulfur dioxide rise from the lower layers into the upper atmosphere of Venus. There, under the action of sunlight, these molecules break down, and then some of them recombine, forming volatile sulfuric acid. ʺVenus Expressʺ also discovered new details on the day side of the planet. When solar heat is absorbed in the atmosphere, "gas pockets" or "convection cells" are formed. You can compare this process to boiling milk in a saucepan. The entire illuminated side of Venus seems to be "boiling". In the process of observations, another mysterious phenomenon was discovered associated with the glow of haze in the upper layers of the Venusian atmosphere. Haze consists of aerosol particles that reflect sunlight well. On January 13, 2007, two-thirds of the planet's southern hemisphere suddenly shone brightly, as if a very intense formation of fog particles had occurred. The mechanism of this phenomenon is still unclear. The glow disappeared just as suddenly a few days later, when the aerosols coagulated ("precipitated") and the haze cleared.

UNSOLVED MYSTERIES OF VENUS.

Venus has actually flooded us with information. Today, the most striking achievement is the discovery of lightning on Venus. So far, lightning has only been seen on Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn. Lightning was detected by the magnetic signals accompanying electrical discharges. They raged under the spacecraft. Lightning was special, they break out in clouds consisting not of water, but of sulfuric acid - another touch to the completely non-resort landscapes of Venus. Lightning is one mystery of the evolution of the planet. They affect the chemical processes in the atmosphere. So on Earth, for example, nitric acid is formed. Attempts will be made to detect "thunderstorm" nitrogen oxides in the Venusian atmosphere as well. The processes taking place in the atmosphere of Venus sometimes simply defy any explanation. For example, "superrotation" is a mysterious phenomenon of the Venusian atmosphere, causing it to rush over the surface of the planet 20 times faster than it rotates around its axis. Where does this terrible, never-ending hurricane get its energy from, why it is not slowed down by the surface - this is another mystery. Why did an acid haze spread over Venus?

There is a lot of data about breaks and folds on the surface of Venus. A growing number of astronomers are inclined to think that real oceans could exist on Venus. The greenhouse effect in the early stages of the planet's existence could be inhibited by intense cloud formation. It is possible that life could have originated on Venus during this time. But it has no water. She once was, but almost all boiled away.

In the light of modern research, it can be said that ancient legends and myths carried traces of real events. In the memory of mankind, a catastrophe occurred on Venus. The writer-encyclopedist Varro, who lived in 116-27 BC. e. , reports that during the flood, Venus changed its color, size and shape. Scientific facts about Venus can confirm the stated version. In particular, the presence of a paradoxically slow rotation of Venus around its own axis: in the opposite direction compared to other planets. This allows us to explain the fact that the pyramid of Cheops was dedicated to her.

But the unsolved mysteries of the planet remain, which will allow us to better understand the fate of the Earth.

Venus enters the sky just after sunset, when it is still light, and floats in the rays of the evening dawn. Or in the morning, when all the stars go out, she alone continues to shine for a long time and remains in the sky until the very sunrise. Therefore, in the old days, she was perceived as two different luminaries, similar to each other: the morning Venus bore the name Vesper (Phosphorus, Hesperus), and the evening - Lucifer. Its mysterious brilliance inspired poets. “Golden Vesper walks in the blue sky field” - this is how A. S. Pushkin wrote about Venus.

There is probably no other such planet that would have so many names and titles. In Russia, she was called Dennitsa, like the morning dawn. Among the astronomers of Ancient Hellas, she bore the name of Aphrodite - the goddess of love and beauty, who could pacify even the rude aggressive Ares (Mars) - the god of war. The Romans called this goddess and planet Venus. Among the Turkic peoples, the beauty - the planet bears the female name Chulpan, from which, perhaps, the name of the flower "tulip" came from. In more ancient times, its light evoked in the minds of people the images of Ishtar, Astarte, Isis - female deities who personified love and beauty. The beautiful brilliance of Venus has long misled scientists, science fiction writers, and poets. On the distant star Venus

The sun is fiery and golden. On Venus, ah on Venus

The trees have blue castings. Everywhere free sonorous waters,

Rivers, geysers, waterfalls Sing the song of freedom at noon,

At night they burn like lamps. (N. S. Gumilyov).

In "Planet of Storms" - a fantastic story by Alexander Kazantsev - Venus looks like a young planet, similar to the Earth in the era of the dinosaurs. The colonization of Venus by people devoted their writings to English and American science fiction writers. J. Adamaschi wrote how the crew of the "flying saucer" took him to Venus and back. Everyone wanted to have at least some life on the neighboring planet, so “like” to Earth. Venusian euphoria continued until the first launches of space rockets with research equipment. As shown by the results of space research, Venus is a very inhospitable planet.

The astronomical symbol of this planet is represented as a ball hovering over a cross.

The landscape is very unattractive, as is the landscape of the greenhouse model:

Venus, characterized by Pythagoras as the sol alter, the second Sun, because of her majestic radiance - which is unparalleled in any of the celestial bodies - was the first to attract the attention of ancient cosmogonists. Therefore, various myths about the mysterious planet were created.

THE TRAGEDY OF THE PLANET VENUS, IMPRESSED IN THE PYRAMIDS.

Ancient Egyptian legends and myths tell that the beginning of their history goes back to a fantastic time when the gods lived on earth with people. They were the gods Osiris, Set and the goddesses Isis and Nephthys. Osiris and Isis formed a married couple and became the first rulers of Egypt. Isis gave birth to one son Horus (Horus), who after the death of Osiris became the first pharaoh. The race of gods, according to legend, ruled Egypt for many millennia. This time in myths was called the "Golden Age". In the chronology of the dynasties of kings, the Egyptians included not only all the pharaohs of the historical period (lasting about 3000 years), but also for good reason mentioned a fantastic era in which gods and demigods ruled Egypt, and the last of them was the god Horus. For example, according to the chronology of the Egyptian priest Manetho, the total age of Egypt was 30 thousand years. The Egyptians claimed that the gods built the pyramids at Giza during the Golden Age. This idea was later adopted by the Greeks, who believed that Hermes (aka the god Thoth) built the pyramids. When Egypt was ruled by human kings, each pharaoh who ascended the throne was given the name Horus, which personified the divine legacy of power. The pharaoh was considered a living image of the god Horus.

The Space Legends of the East say that people lived on Venus who were ahead of the humanity of the Earth by a whole step. They appeared on Earth as teachers of young humanity and were remembered by earthlings in the form of gods who came from heaven, who at a certain time lived on Earth together with people in the era of the "Golden Age".

The Polish researcher of the Egyptian pyramids V. Zamarovsky, in his book "Their Majesties the Pyramids", noticed an oddity in the location of the small pyramids near the pyramid of Cheops. and Mikerin. The companion pyramids of the tomb of Menkaure are completely different in style. Following the cosmic version, it is logical to assume that the small pyramids depicted the satellites of the corresponding planets: Earth, Mars, Venus. For the Earth, there will be complete agreement with this version: near the tomb of Khafre there is one small pyramid, symbolizing the Moon. In this case, Mars in that era had three satellites instead of the present two: Phobos and Deimos; Venus also had three satellites. Since Venus currently does not have a satellite, it can be assumed that a catastrophe occurred in those distant times. The nature of the catastrophe can be interpreted in such a way that by the time fixed by the plan of the pyramids, the satellite system of Venus had disintegrated. This is what led to a change in the color, shape and size of the "star" Venus, observed from Earth.

The mutual position of the satellite pyramids and their main pyramids from the side of the Center:

1 - the pyramid of Menkaur; 2 - Khafre; 3 - Khufu

At the same time, the mass of the planetary-satellite system of Venus decreased by 32%. In accordance with what has been said, this mass has been redistributed in the solar system. One satellite could turn into a new planet Mercury, another could lose its orbital angular momentum during a catastrophe and was absorbed by the Sun, and the third satellite, having received additional energy, could be thrown into a higher orbit, for example, into the orbit of the asteroid belt.

Checking the relationship between the volumes of the pyramids and the masses of the corresponding planets, we arrive at the following data. The ratio of the volumes of the pyramids of Menkaur and Khafre is 0.117, which is very close to the ratio of the masses of the planets Mars and Earth, equal to 0.11. The ratio of the volumes of the pyramids of Khufu and Khafre is 1.19, which contradicts the ratio of the masses of Venus and the Earth, equal to 0.82. We come to the conclusion that as a result of the catastrophe, Venus should lose 32% of its mass, which looks very unrealistic in a very short time by astronomical standards. The collapse of the satellite system of Venus led to the death of the living conditions on the planet Venus. This can explain, in particular, the presence of a paradoxically slow rotation of Venus around its own axis: in the opposite direction compared to other planets and with the duration of its day, equal to 243 Earth days. Cosmogony cannot explain such an anomalous phenomenon on the basis of an evolutionary concept. Does this mean that Venus has experienced some kind of catastrophe in its history? According to Varro, the catastrophe also occurred on Earth in the form of the Great Flood, which swept away the specific results of this era, some memories remained in legends and myths. The cause of the flood must be sought after the collapse of the satellite system of Venus. The fall of one of the hypothetical satellites on the Sun (according to estimates, its mass was 2.5 times the mass of the planet Mercury) should cause a powerful burst of solar activity, and the interaction of the solar wind squall with the Earth's geomagnetic field generated a "magnetic shock" that provoked a global earthquake on Earth ending in a flood.

We come to the following conclusion, the astronomical plan of the pyramids reflected the time of the Great Flood on Earth, a phenomenon that was preceded by the catastrophe of Venus. Only this can explain the image of Venus on the plan in the past tense. As for Mars, this planet suffered a catastrophe later. This is evidenced by the absence at the present time of the third satellite of the "red planet".

The legends of the peoples of the East are consistent with the above conclusion (the book "Space Legends of the East", 1996). They say that people lived on Venus who were ahead of the humanity of the Earth by a whole step. They appeared on Earth as teachers of young humanity and were remembered by earthlings in the form of gods who came from heaven, who at a certain time lived on Earth together with people in the era of the "Golden Age".

In the light of the disclosed data, it can be said that ancient legends and myths carried traces of real events. The ancient gods must be aliens from a highly developed civilization from Venus. Thus, information is stored in the memory of mankind that a catastrophe occurred on Venus that destroyed it. Such a scenario of events makes it possible to explain the mystery of why the greatest pyramid, the pyramid of Cheops, is dedicated to Venus.

The grandiose earthquake and the great global flood destroyed and swept away almost all the buildings and achievements of the golden age, little evidence, legends and myths remained, reflecting the real events of antiquity. The complex of the majestic Egyptian pyramids in Giza with the legendary Sphinx is not only the tomb of the demigods-pharaohs, it is an undoubted evidence of an older time than the era of the Egyptian pharaohs. It is intended, according to a scientist from Ulyanovsk Evgeny Menshov, to perpetuate the memory of the disappeared Venusian civilization, to convey a message to earthlings about its history, development and causes of death. This is the oldest monument-warning of impending cosmic and planetary cataclysms. After all, the cause of the death of a highly developed civilization could not be a collision with a comet at all, but, for example, a man-made or environmental disaster. Earthlings have yet to finally understand the essence of the cosmic idea of ​​the Egyptian pyramids.

The following considerations speak in favor of this version. Firstly, the hypothesis that Mercury is a former satellite of Venus is not new, although it has not been proven, and, in any case, the special genesis of this tiny planet is undeniable. Secondly, the bodies that make up the asteroid belt are clearly of a different nature and origin; In addition, their sizes vary greatly - from

A MODERN VIEW ON THE BEAUTY VENUS.

At present, Venus appears to be a planet with impossible conditions for any life. Radio observations essentially marked the beginning of a new stage in the study of Venus. Only radio waves were able to bring from the surface of Venus, reliably hidden from observation by a dense atmosphere, some physical characteristics that made it possible to build hypothetical models of the atmosphere of Venus.

Radar methods made it possible to determine the direction and period of Venus' own rotation. It turned out that Venus rotates in the opposite direction to the rotation of the Earth and other planets of the solar system. The period of rotation of Venus relative to the stars is about 244 Earth days. This fact is unclear and unexplained. Therefore, scientists rightly call Venus a mysterious planet. And despite the fact that all the powerful technology of planetary astronomy - radio telescopes and radars equipped with the most sensitive quantum amplifiers and giant antennas, optical telescopes with infrared receivers and perfect spectral equipment - was aimed at obtaining new information about the physical characteristics of the planet, there was no interpretation of the data obtained. unambiguous and gave rise to various hypotheses, as in ancient times.

The Venus Express spacecraft explores the planet's atmospheric vortices.

VENUS IS THE CURVE MIRROR OF THE EARTH.

Venus has often been called Earth's sister. Maybe this is a sister, but not like that. Detailed studies of the air envelope of Venus were carried out only in the middle of the 20th century. In terms of physical characteristics (mass, diameter, average density), Venus is in many ways reminiscent of the Earth: it was even considered the "twin" of our planet.

Mass: 4.87 1024 kg, i.e. 0.82 Earth masses;

Diameter: 12 102 km;

Density: 5250 kg/m³;

Surface temperature: maximum +480°C;

Free fall acceleration: 8.9 m/s²;

Average distance from the Sun: 0.72 a. e. (107.7 million km);

Venus moves around the Sun in a relatively regular circular orbit at a speed of 35 km/sec.

The results of the research give grounds to assume that Venus was indeed once the "double" of the Earth, not only in size, but also in the nature of the processes that took place on the surface, but then their destinies diverged.

“Venus experienced a real climate catastrophe, but we still don’t know why and when,” emphasizes David Grinspoon, an employee of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. “Now we know that once Venus was more like Earth. While we cannot fully reveal this story, but the data obtained allows us to say that the Venera Express will solve the mystery of water on Venus."

The internal structure of Venus is probably very similar to the Earth's: an iron core with a radius of about 3000 km, a molten mantle, which is part of most planets. The latest data on the study of the gravitational field of Venus from Magellan show that the crust on Venus is much harder and thicker than previously thought. As on Earth, convection in Venus's mantle causes surface tremors that occur in many small areas, rather than being concentrated mainly to the boundaries of tectonic plates, as on Earth. It turns out that it was once a twin of the Earth and the processes that took place on its surface. However, then something happened to Venus, some kind of catastrophe that scientists still have no idea about, something like that, after which it turned into hell. On Venus, oceans of liquid water could have existed for two billion years, and it is possible that it was from there that life came to Earth. Astronomers know how to test this hypothesis, and intend to do so in the near future.

Venus has no moons and thus no tides.

Whatever happened to Venus in the distant past, today it is a very strange planet, sharply different from the Earth, and from Mars, and from all the others known to us. The day of Venus lasts 243 Earth days, and its year is 228. It rotates not only slowly, but also "incorrectly", in the other direction than all the other planets of the solar system, except for Uranus. And the sun rises in the west for her. But, unfortunately, a more detailed study of Venus shows that in many aspects it is radically different from the Earth.

A morning star named Venus, this enigmatic planet has become even more enigmatic after a nearly two-year visit to it by the European spacecraft Venus Express.

COLLONISATION OF VENUS.

Venus is a candidate for terraforming. According to one of the plans, it was supposed to spray genetically modified blue-green algae in the atmosphere of Venus, which, by converting carbon dioxide (the atmosphere of Venus is 96% carbon dioxide) into oxygen, would significantly reduce the greenhouse effect and lower the temperature on the planet. However, photosynthesis requires the presence of water, which, according to recent data, is practically absent on Venus (even in the form of vapor in the atmosphere). Therefore, to implement such a project, it is necessary first of all to deliver water to Venus - for example, by bombarding it with water-ammonia asteroids or in another way.

It should be noted that at an altitude of ~ 50-100 km in the atmosphere of Venus, there are conditions under which some terrestrial bacteria can exist.

Venus is by no means a hospitable world, as it was once supposed. With its atmosphere of carbon dioxide, clouds of sulfuric acid and terrible heat, it is completely unsuitable for humans. Under the weight of this information, some hopes collapsed, but with the advent of the space age for Venus, the eyes of scientists are again turned to it. Perhaps the resurgence of interest in Venus is due to the growing evidence that Mars has never been a warm planet with a powerful atmosphere and a lot of water on the surface. This means that in the solar system initially there were only two celestial bodies on which life could originate - Venus and Earth. Moreover, two billion years of the existence of liquid water on Venus could lead not only to the emergence of life, but also to its significant evolution. And perhaps space exploration is the key to finding out how things really were.


Venus is our closest neighbor. Its dimensions, mass and density of rocks are close to those of the earth. At the same time, its magnetic field is almost three times weaker than on Earth. Venus rotates very slowly around its axis in the opposite direction to the rotation of the Earth. The pressure on its surface reaches 10 million Pa, and the temperature is about +500 ° C. At an altitude of 49 km, a powerful layer of clouds extends above the planet. This does not exhaust the mysteries of Venus. Until recently, the reasons for the sharp depletion of its atmosphere with water, the mechanism of hurricane-force winds at altitudes of about 60 km, the structure of its relief, the composition of the constituent rocks, etc., remained unclear until recently.

Now, thanks to the systematic study of the planet by Soviet scientists, many of its secrets have been revealed.

Unlike other terrestrial planets, the study of Venus with telescopes proved impossible. After all, even M. V. Lomonosov, observing on June 6, 1761, the passage of the planet across the disk of the Sun, established that it was surrounded by "a noble air atmosphere, such (if only not more) than is poured around our globe." Therefore, until recently, ideas about the structure of the surface and the composition of rocks on Venus remained hypothetical. At the same time, some researchers came to fantastic constructions. It was assumed, for example, that hydrocarbons could form in the atmosphere of Venus. In this case, according to the American scientist F. Hoyle, Venus should be covered with an ocean of oil. In another version, it was assumed that complex molecules close to those plastics that are obtained in factories can be created in the atmosphere, and the surface of the planet is lined with a layer of natural plastic. According to the American researcher E. Epik, Venus is characterized by strong dust storms, the lower layers of the atmosphere are saturated with dust, which helps maintain a high temperature. In this case, the surface should also be covered with a layer of dust, just as it was envisaged by T. Gold's "dust hypothesis" for the Moon. I can't even believe that all this was seriously discussed just recently. But to be sure, it is enough to refer to the book by F. Whipple "Earth, Moon and Planets", which was published in Russian translation in 1967. Similar ideas are captured in the colorful album "Planets of the Solar System", published in Prague in 1963. This album was prepared by Czech researchers J. Sadil and L. Peshek, combining fiction with scientific ideas. Expressive, bright landscapes depict reddish rocks, an approaching dust storm, volcanic craters with lakes of boiling sulfur, gloomy sea expanses, stunted shoots of vegetation on the shores. These landscapes reflected all the main points of view on the nature of the surface, which allowed here conditions of a humid climate with the development of an organic world close to the Paleozoic on Earth, a dry waterless desert or oceanic spaces.

In 1961, the first spacecraft was launched towards Venus. The Venera-1 station passed at a distance of less than 100,000 km from the planet. Venera-2, launched in 1965, approached the planet at a distance of 24,000 km. March 1, 1966 Venera-3 successfully reaches the surface of the planet.

The station "Venera-4" made an interplanetary journey in 1967. Its descent vehicle smoothly plunged into the atmosphere of the planet with the help of a parachute. Temperature, pressure and composition of the atmosphere were measured. In 1969, the Venera-5 and Venera-6 stations were sent to Venus. Their landers probed the atmosphere up to 20 km above the solid surface. In 1970, the descent vehicle of the Venera-7 station made a soft landing on the planet. Within 23 minutes after landing, it received signals with information about the operation of the instruments. In 1972, the descent vehicle of the Venera-8 station made a soft landing on the surface of the planet, from which important information was received for 50 minutes.

1975 was marked by outstanding achievements in the study of Venus. Two stations "Venera-9" and "Venera-10" were launched into the orbits of artificial satellites of this planet. Their descent vehicles smoothly descended to the surface. Panoramic television images of the area and other scientific information were received from both devices for 53 and 65 minutes.

In 1978, the study of Venus was continued by the Venera-11 and Venera-12 stations, which reached the surface south of the Beta region. Finally, in 1982, the Venera-13 and Venera-14 stations, having made a soft landing on the surface of the planet, made it possible to carry out a whole range of scientific research, including drilling and sampling of soil for chemical testing. As a result of the outstanding research performed by the AMS of the Venus series, rigorous scientific data have replaced hypotheses. There was an opportunity to lift the veil of mystery of some phenomena on the planet.

At the present time, one can definitely speak about the composition of the Venusian atmosphere. As previously assumed, it consists of carbon dioxide - 97%. In addition to it, nitrogen is present in an amount of about 3%. Fractions of percent fall on inert gases (mainly argon), oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids, water vapor and some other elements.

The huge amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of Venus is associated mainly with volcanic activity. On Earth, volcanic eruptions release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Periodic changes in the climate on Earth, leading to glaciations, are associated by some scientists precisely with fluctuations in the content of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere. On Venus, the carbon dioxide atmosphere creates a kind of "greenhouse effect", preventing the planet's thermal radiation from passing into outer space. Perhaps this explains the high temperatures near the surface of the planet, reaching 470 ° C.

Of particular interest are the clouds of Venus, which completely hide its surface from observation from Earth. They are at an altitude of about 49 km and reach a thickness of 20 km. According to Soviet researchers L. V. Ksanfomaliti, M. Ya. Marov, and A. D. Kuzmin, who analyzed the data obtained by the Venera and Pioneer-Venus stations, the clouds have a layered structure. The upper part of the clouds, apparently, consists of droplets of sulfuric acid, and in their middle and lower parts, in all likelihood, salts of hydrochloric acid in the form of crystalline particles predominate.

The complex dynamics of the atmosphere and the movement of clouds is noted. Apparently, there are powerful polar vortices and simply strong winds, most intense at altitudes above 40 km. Near the surface of the planet, the winds are weak. This also explains the absence of dust at the landing sites of the descent vehicles of the Venus stations.

Due to the development of a powerful atmosphere, sounding remains the only reliable means of remotely studying the surface. With the help of ground-based radio telescopes, the near-equatorial strip and individual sections with a diameter of 1500 km were studied. Experiments on radio mapping of Venus were carried out from the Venera-9 and Venera-10 stations. The signals reflected from the surface of Venus were received by terrestrial radio telescopes. At the same time, several extended ledges were established in the southern hemisphere, elongated in the latitudinal direction for several hundred kilometers at a height of up to 3 km.

The radar survey of Venus was carried out from the American Pioneer Venus satellite. The resolution of these radio images is about 30-50 km. According to satellite radar sounding data, a map has been compiled covering 83% of the planet's surface, between 75 ° N. sh. and 63°S sh.

Data on the relief of Venus make it possible to distinguish lowlands on its surface, which are depressions, hilly plains and mountain ranges.

Lowlands, located below the average level of the planet (6051 km) by 1-2.5 km, occupy 16% of its surface. They form two wide arcuate bands of depressions located on both sides of the equator and touching with their convex parts almost along the zero meridian. They have a smooth relief and are weakly saturated with ring structures of impact origin, which indicates the relative youth of the relief.

Hilly plains occupy 60% of the surface. Their hypsometric level does not exceed 500 m from the average level of the planet. They are distinguished by uniform reflectivity in the radio range. The main landforms are small ridges, hills and depressions. The surface of the plains is complicated by a large number of ring structures-craters, the diameters of which reach 400-600 km, and the depth is 200-700 m. Some structures have central hillocks, which confirms their impact origin. The relatively shallow depth of the craters, together with traces of destruction, testifies to their antiquity. Distinctly pronounced large craters were named Lisa, Meitner, Sappho and Eva. There are numerous small craters with a diameter of 150-200 km and a depth of a few hundred meters. The presence on the surface of the hilly plains of a large number of heavily destroyed ancient craters gives grounds to compare them with the ancient continental regions of the Moon and Mars. There are practically no large shield volcanoes within the continental plains. An exception may be Mount Hathor, but its volcanic nature has not yet been strictly established.

The elevated regions cover 24% of the surface, forming four isolated mountainous countries: the Land of Ishtar and the Land of Aphrodite and the regions of Beta and Alpha. The land of Ishtar is a plateau, complicated by mountain structures. Its height is 3-7 km above the average level. The plateau has the shape of a wide oval, elongated in the latitudinal direction for 2000 km. It is separated from adjacent plains by steep ledges. A relatively leveled area within the land of Ishtar was called the Lakshmi Plateau. The plateau is framed by the Akna, Freya and Maxwell mountains. The highest point on the planet is registered in the Maxwell Mountains, rising 11.8 km above the average level and 9 km above the area adjacent to the mountains. On the eastern slope of the Maxwell Mountains there is a crater 100 km in diameter and 1 km deep. It is assumed to be of volcanic origin.

The land of Aphrodite has the shape of a latitude-oriented oval with a length of 1500 km. Its peaks rise up to 9 km above the average level. According to radio astronomical observations, rounded uplifts have been identified within the Aphrodite Land. Their diameter is 700 km at a height above the surrounding area of ​​6-8 km.

The Beta region is a meridionally oriented uplift 5-6 km above the average level, topped by two large shield volcanoes - the Rhea and Teii mountains. One of the volcanoes has a relative height of 5 km and a diameter of about 700 km. At its top is a caldera with a diameter of about 90 km. This volcano exceeds in size the greatest volcano of Mars - Olympus, but is inferior to it in height. American researchers R. Saunders and M. Malin suggested that the Venusian volcanoes cannot be too high because of the greater gravity on the planet than on Mars. In addition, on Venus, the relief should be actively destroyed under the influence of chemical weathering due to the high content of acids and other active components in the atmosphere.

The Alpha region is a rise 1800 m above the average level. It is characterized by significant indentation due to the development of subparallel faults.

The tectonic nature of the elevated regions of Venus should be judged taking into account the youth and significant dissection of the relief developed within them, the absence of ancient large destroyed craters of impact origin, the confinement of all the largest shield volcanoes to them, and a clear connection with rift structures. All this gives full grounds for comparing the elevated regions of Venus with the tectonic-volcanic uplifts of Mars Tharsis and Elysium.

In the central part of the planet, a number of cracks can be traced, forming a rift system, which may have a global character. In terms of plan, the rift system, according to A. M. Nikishin, resembles a huge triangle oriented from east to west, the base of which is located south of the Beta uplift. In the latitudinal direction, the rift system of Venus extends along the Aphrodite Rise for a distance of over 20,000 km.

Despite the development of the rift system, it can be assumed that in general, compared with the Earth and Mars, the number of faults on Venus may be less. Due to the slow rotation of the planet and the low values ​​of the Coriolis forces, the system of planetary fracturing is apparently not so intensively developed on it.

The main stages of tectonic evolution can be judged on the basis of the features of the surface structure of Venus, taking into account the data of comparative planetology. Initially, an ancient crust of the continental type arose, which experienced an intense meteorite bombardment. By analogy with the Moon, this process ended approximately at the turn of 4 billion years. Later, depressions formed, filled with basalts, as well as on other planetary bodies of the terrestrial group. The youngest tectonic elements are tectonic-volcanic uplifts topped, as on Mars, by giant shield volcanoes. Let's hope that, unlike Mars, these volcanoes have not yet ceased their activity. In this case, the peculiarities of the composition of the atmosphere of Venus and the concentration of lightning near volcanoes, the freshness of detrital material, and the development of steep slopes near the Beta Rise with its clearly defined large volcanoes will be explained.

Determining the composition of the rocks of Venus became possible after landing on its surface of descent vehicles from the station of the "Venus" series, on which gamma spectrographs were installed. They analyzed the content of natural radioactive elements in the soil: uranium, thorium and potassium isotope. The type of rock at the landing site of the AMS Venera-8 descent vehicle turned out to be close to terrestrial granites in terms of the content of radioactive elements, in the areas of landings of Venera-9 and Venera-10 - to basalts. The descent vehicle of the Venera-10 station determined the density of the soil using a radioactive density meter. It turned out to be 2.7 g/cm 3 , which fully confirmed the radar data. Viewing the latest panoramas of the planet and the results of chemical analyzes of rocks, according to Soviet scientists, allow us to conclude that 70% of its surface is composed of ancient basalts, analogues of which on Earth are formed at depths of 60-80 km. Preliminary data from the chemical analysis of rocks indicate that in the landing area of ​​the Venera-13 station there is a rock that has undergone chemical weathering and corresponds in composition to leucite basalt. This type of deep basalt rocks with a high content of potassium and magnesium is quite rare in terrestrial conditions. And the rock studied in the landing area of ​​the Venera-14 station and representing tholeiite basalt is quite widespread on Earth.

To study the structure of the surface, television panoramic images transmitted from descent vehicles are of particular help. Thus, the descent vehicle of the Venera-9 station transmitted an image of the surface of the northeastern outskirts of the Beta region. Its surface is covered with large acute-angled stones. The diameter of the largest of them is 50-70 cm with a height of 15-20 cm. They are in the form of plates with stepped spalls. Between the stones, the surface is covered with light fine-earth material. On individual stones, dark spots are visible, resembling weathering cells. The apparatus is located on a slope with a steepness of about 30°. The slope is covered with scree. The sharp edges of the fragments indicate that they were formed quite recently and did not undergo significant destruction.

The descent vehicle of the Venera-10 station landed southeast of the Beta region, approximately 2000 km from the landing site of the descent vehicle of the Venera-9 station. He transmitted an image of the area, which is a flat rocky desert. Large boulders are more than 3 m in diameter and are covered with dark spots corresponding to depressions such as weathering cells. Stone blocks are immersed in dark soil. The block is split by cracks. In appearance, it resembles terrestrial igneous rocks that have undergone significant changes.

The panoramas of the Beta region, obtained from the Venera-13 and Venera-14 stations, clearly depict large blocks of rocky layered rock of dark gray color with a cellular surface. The space between the blocks is covered with fine-grained brownish-black material. The absence of noticeable secondary changes in the studied breeds may indicate their young age.

The problem of soil sampling at the Venera-13 and Venera-14 stations was solved in a very interesting way. According to V. L. Barsukov, special soil sampling devices took samples of the rocks, then the soil supply mechanisms transferred them inside the sealed compartments. At the same time, the temperature of the samples taken was reset from 457 ° to 20-30 ° C, and the pressure - from 10 million Pa to 10 thousand Pa. After that, the samples were fed into the receiving chambers of X-ray fluorescence analyzers, which determined the content of the main rock-forming chemical elements (from sodium to iron) in them and transmitted the obtained spectra to the Earth. It is likely that the composition of the atmosphere of Venus cannot but affect the rocks of its surface. This issue was considered by Soviet scientists V. L. Barsukov and V. P. Volkov. They proceeded from the latest data on differences in the composition of updrafts and downdrafts of the subcloud troposphere. Downstreams contain elevated concentrations of water vapor and sulfur. The composition of ascending flows includes gaseous products of the interaction of gases with rocks, as well as gases of deep origin. Calculations have shown that the interaction of descending flows of the troposphere with basalts produces pyrite, anhydrite, and amphiboles, while in the case of ascending flows, only pyrite and anhydrite are formed. In this case, rocks such as granites should not undergo significant transformations. However, the authors rightly note that the magnitude of this kind of chemical weathering cannot be reliably determined, so it is not clear whether Venus is covered entirely with altered rocks or only with thin surface films.


Panorama of the surface of Venus (AMS "Venera-13" and "Venera-14")

The study of Venus continues. In accordance with the program for the exploration of outer space and the planets of the solar system, in June 1983 the Soviet Union launched the AMS "Venera-15" and "Venera-16". Both stations are similar in design and purpose. The flight of two stations will make it possible to carry out independent complex measurements over various regions of Venus from the orbits of artificial satellites of this planet.

Each new result of the study of the planets brings us closer to a deeper knowledge of the Earth, and in this a significant role belongs to the achievements of Soviet science, thanks to which it was possible to reveal some of the secrets of Venus.